1 posted on
08/28/2006 7:29:35 AM PDT by
tang0r
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: tang0r
2 posted on
08/28/2006 7:30:33 AM PDT by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: tang0r
Or we should outlaw alcohol again...
To: tang0r
Great way to have a generation of kids only grow up to live in their parents basement playing X-box...
Stupid Stoner Krap Ping...
4 posted on
08/28/2006 7:32:03 AM PDT by
in hoc signo vinces
("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
To: tang0r
Heaven forbid common sense enter into the pot issue . . .
To: tang0r
AW GEEZ!
8 posted on
08/28/2006 7:33:44 AM PDT by
guitar4jesus
(Black, Conservative . . . and I vote!)
To: tang0r
Alcohol is a bad thing. Drink enough and you can be impaired for a day or even two.
Marijuana, however, impairs a user for weeks. It's use is also tied to the development of schizophrenia and clinical depression.
Equating the two is pointless.
9 posted on
08/28/2006 7:33:46 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
To: tang0r
So let me get this straight - there's a push to ban smoking cigarettes, but allow smoking pot???? Makes a whole lot of sense doesn't it?
To: tang0r
Drunkards are very intolerant...
To: tang0r
while there may be merit from a legal/criminal/common sense standpoint, this must never be allowed to happen because then the hippies will have won.
To: tang0r
Nice logical libertarian argument.
Now watch the single-minded, blue-nosed "conservatives" here, flame broil you for lunch.
Sigh, now I've gone and done it!! FLAME ON!!!
16 posted on
08/28/2006 7:36:53 AM PDT by
Al Gator
(Refusing to "stoop to your enemy's level", gets you cut off at the knees.)
To: tang0r
Nice logical libertarian argument.
Now watch the single-minded, blue-nosed "conservatives" here, flame broil you for lunch.
Sigh, now I've gone and done it!! FLAME ON!!!
18 posted on
08/28/2006 7:39:10 AM PDT by
Al Gator
(Refusing to "stoop to your enemy's level", gets you cut off at the knees.)
To: tang0r
Alcohol has little or no proven medicinal valueThis is a blatent lie in the article.
19 posted on
08/28/2006 7:39:11 AM PDT by
frogjerk
(REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
To: tang0r
William F.Buckley Jr.AGREES!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To: tang0r
I wouldn't mind decriminalizing drugs if we could simply hold those who did something to another while under the influence as though it were premeditated.
That, coupled with a strong torture penalty, would let me go with legalizing drugs.
And you can put me first in line as a guest torturer.
To: tang0r
For all of the empty rhetoric about economics and black markets, the end of Prohibition was due to a single principle: Prohibition failed because it wasn't a prohibition. Possession was legal, doctors gave out millions of prescriptions for whiskey, low alcohol beer was legal, and law enforcement was banned from establishments that served alcohol.
28 posted on
08/28/2006 7:43:06 AM PDT by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: tang0r
Does anybody not agree that FEDERAL drug laws are unconstitutional? I thought we all worshipped the enumeration around here (I know I do). In the good old days when the Con. was respected, and the FED wanted to do something about a drug, they had the decency to do it right -- moving against alcohol through a legal Constitutional amendment process. My view is this -- NO fed. drug laws. If the state of TX wants to put you in jail for 10,000,000,000,000,000 years for merely thinking about pot, that's up to the people of the state of TX. If MASS wants to reward you with praise for smoking 10,000,000,000,000,000 pounds of pot, that's up to the people of the state of MASS.
33 posted on
08/28/2006 7:47:12 AM PDT by
RayStacy
To: tang0r
Should it also be legal for soldiers to get stoned when off duty?
39 posted on
08/28/2006 7:51:13 AM PDT by
DungeonMaster
(More and more churches are nada scriptura.)
To: tang0r
No one can - nor should try to - challenge the fact that alcoholism is a social disease, that youth drinking creates a net loss to society, that nearly all alcohol consumption is physically unhealthy, and that there is little medicinal or health benefit to the substance itself.
40 posted on
08/28/2006 7:51:14 AM PDT by
frogjerk
(REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
To: tang0r
Just think of the riches that will flow into City and State treasuries to prevent abuse with steep taxes similar to Cigarettes.
And all those lost income opportunities for hordes of the permanently non working part of society.
And, oh yes, how all of a sudden our law enforcing segment will swing into full action to eradicate free traders by enforcing the serious crime of tax cheating on pot.
Taxes as a moral deterrent, sounds so convincing coming from politicians.
41 posted on
08/28/2006 7:51:56 AM PDT by
hermgem
(The same)
To: tang0r
Try getting a job in construction with a positive test for marijuana.
They won't turn you in but they also will not hire you and if you do pass will fire you in a second if you fail subsequent tests.
Only a matter of time before some attorney makes a drug test part of his civil suit litigation in accidents.
43 posted on
08/28/2006 7:52:51 AM PDT by
N. Theknow
((Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson