Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supernova caught in its exploding act (NASA SWIFT detects milder gamma-ray burst GRB, X-ray flash)
Reuters on Yahoo ^ | 8/30/06 | Reuters

Posted on 08/30/2006 11:46:03 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

LONDON (Reuters) - Teams of international scientists have used observations from NASA's Swift satellite and other telescopes to witness the evolution of a cosmic blast into a stellar explosion or supernova.

The blast is thought to be a milder type of gamma-ray burst (GRB) -- the most powerful type of explosion known to astronomers -- called an X-ray flash.

It is known as GRB060218 after the February 18 date it began in the constellation of Aries about 440 million light years away. A light year is about 6 trillion miles, the distance light travels in a year.

"This extends the GRB-supernova connection to X-ray flashes and fainter supernovae, implying a common origin," said Elena Pian of Italy's National Institute for Astrophysics in Trieste and the lead author of one of four research papers about the event in the journal Nature on Wednesday.

It is the second-closest gamma-ray burst ever detected and the first view of a supernova in the act of exploding, according to the astronomers.

Pian and her group confirmed that the explosion was tied to a supernova called SN2006aj a few days after the outburst, which lasted 100 times longer than a typical gamma-ray burst but was much dimmer.

Alicia Soderberg and her colleagues at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena used radio and X-ray wavelengths to calculate that GRB060218 was about 100 times less energetic than ordinary GRBs but similar events are probably more common.

In another report in the journal, Sergio Campana and scientists at the National Institute for Astrophysics observatory in Merate, Italy also said the collapsing star was associated with a supernova.

X-ray flashes appear to signal an explosion that leaves behind a neutron star while gamma-ray bursts are thought to mark the birth of a black hole, a region of space from which nothing can escape.

Scientists led by Paolo Mazzali, of the Max Planck Institute of Astrophysics in Garching, Germany found that the star had a smaller mass than those estimated for the normal GRB-supernova.

"The properties of GRB060218 suggest the existence of a population of events less luminous than classical GRBs, but possibly more numerous," Mazzali said in a statement.

In a commentary in the journal, Timothy Young of the University of North Dakota in the United States said the research has shown that at least some GRBs are warnings of the imminent explosion of massive stars.

"All four papers make clear that the exploding object sent out both a slightly aspherical shockwave, typical of a supernova, and a jet-like stream of material characteristic of a GRB," he said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Germany; News/Current Events; US: California; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: burst; champaignsupernova; detects; exploding; flash; gammaray; grb; nasa; supernova; swift; xray
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

The Swift satellite is seen in an undated rendering from NASA. Teams of international scientists have used observations from NASA's Swift satellite and other telescopes to witness the evolution of a cosmic blast into a stellar explosion or supernova. (NASA/Handout/Reuters)


1 posted on 08/30/2006 11:46:04 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

BUSH'S FAULT!.......


2 posted on 08/30/2006 11:48:59 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Good article, but "obviously" this is caused by global warming, so therefore, the supernova is all Bush's fault...

;)

3 posted on 08/30/2006 11:49:04 AM PDT by kromike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission

UVOT Image of Supernova 2006dm in MCG

4 posted on 08/30/2006 11:50:00 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ......Help the "Pendleton 8' and families -- http://www.freerepublic.com/~normsrevenge/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

5 posted on 08/30/2006 11:51:49 AM PDT by Andy from Beaverton (I'm so anti-pc, I use a mac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge



UVOT images of NGC1371/SN2005ke.

On the left is an image in the V, B, and U bands and on the right is an image in the UVW1, UVW2, and UVM2 bands. The position of the supernova is indicated by the circle in each image. The red "arc" in the left image is an artifact from a foreground star at the detector edge in the V-band.


6 posted on 08/30/2006 11:55:22 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ......Help the "Pendleton 8' and families -- http://www.freerepublic.com/~normsrevenge/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Could the signing of the Kyoto treaty prevented this?

It looks like Women and Children will be hit hardest.

7 posted on 08/30/2006 11:56:50 AM PDT by lormand (Nuke the Islamic States, or kiss your @55 goodbye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I thought I saw something last night....;^)


8 posted on 08/30/2006 11:59:43 AM PDT by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kromike
If there were planets around that star, there was most certainly be a period of global warming.

Of course, this is all ancient history now...

As usual, FEMA has no plan of action in the inevitable case that our star goes nova.
9 posted on 08/30/2006 12:06:30 PM PDT by rock_lobsta (cair = hamas = iran = EVIL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rock_lobsta
"As usual, FEMA has no plan of action in the inevitable case that our star goes nova."

You're right! Given normal beaurcratic reaction times Two billion years may not be enough.

Bush's fault!!!

A vote for Pelosi can avoid the exlposi!

Yeah right!

10 posted on 08/30/2006 12:19:31 PM PDT by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

440 million years is a long time...when the supernova exploded, the earth was in the early Silurian period of the Paleozoic. The dinosaurs arose, flourished, and disappeared while this light was making its way here.


11 posted on 08/30/2006 12:38:31 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Should we believe any picture coming out of Al-Reuters?


12 posted on 08/30/2006 12:40:07 PM PDT by bruin66 (Time: Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruin66

"Should we believe any picture coming out of Al-Reuters?"

No. There was no supernova. It didn't happen. They faked it. In fact, the stars are actually tiny pinholes in black velvet that is held up over the night sky by a flock of gigantic pelicans.

All this 440 million light years away stuff is just nonsense, promulgated by the filthy evolutionists. The black velvet is only 400 miles above the earth.

The earth, itself, is held up by a giant turtle, and that turtle stands on a turtle that holds up the sun and moon, which are just about 100 miles above the earth. Another turtle supports the two other turtles and holds up the rest of the universe, including that black velvet.

Beyond that, there are innumerable other turtles. In fact, it's turtles all the way down.


13 posted on 08/30/2006 1:03:09 PM PDT by MineralMan (Non-evangelical Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

Good one...lol!


14 posted on 08/30/2006 1:07:40 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

Most excellent!


15 posted on 08/30/2006 2:07:32 PM PDT by bruin66 (Time: Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

"440 million years is a long time...when the supernova exploded, the earth was in the early Silurian period of the Paleozoic. The dinosaurs arose, flourished, and disappeared while this light was making its way here."


There is an assumption built into that statement that that the speed of light (c = 299,792,458 m/s) was constant for last the 440 million years.... if the speed of light was slower in the past this number could be more...if the speed of light was faster in the past this number could be less....


There has been some intesting work on this subject the last few years.... first peer reviewed published by Setterfeild in 1987....

Setterfield and Norman SRI in July 1987
Dr. Joao Magueijo, a physicist at Imperial College London

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jo%C3%A3o_Magueijo

Dr. John Barrow of Cambridge
Dr. Andy Albrecht of the University of California at Davis Dr. John Moffat of the University of Toronto

have all published work advocating their belief that light speed was much higher – as much as 10 to the 10th power faster in the past...

Variable speed of light theory:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_speed_of_light

http://www.setterfield.org




16 posted on 08/30/2006 2:41:03 PM PDT by FreedomProtector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I worked on the IceCube project until recently. We were very excited when we heard about this GRB around February 25, 2006.

Our Principal Investigator had us had us review data in the 2/18/2006 time period but cautioned us to keep things under our hats until the event could be verified by other instruments.

This is very cool!

17 posted on 08/30/2006 3:34:03 PM PDT by robomurph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomProtector

From the very link you posted. This is silliness.



"Some Young Earth Creationists have investigated the idea of a changing c in 1987[46] as an explanation for the discrepancy between the biblical and measured ages of the universe. This idea was mentioned by Marilyn vos Savant in Parade magazine.[47] This idea has been refuted.[48]"



Actually the speed of light was changed by Satan, in the year 4236 B.C. to confound various angels. This change in the speed of light caused several angels to fly into planets, breaking limbs and mussing their hair.

As a side effect, it confused human beings, who began to believe that the universe was billions of years old, when it was really only 6000 years old.

Yahweh was not amused at all, and fixed the speed of light. Satan was severely chastened and his air conditioning was shut off for 1258 years. The dispute still goes on, although it is generally accepted that the speed of light is approximately 186,000 miles per second.

Some human beings, however, are still confused about this and major arguments have taken place over the years.


18 posted on 08/30/2006 4:53:33 PM PDT by MineralMan (Non-evangelical Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
The Variable Speed of Light theory is not 'silliness', nor is it only proposed by 'Creationists'. The Variable Speed of Light is advocated by scientists with atheistic presuppositions of ultimate reality as well. It doesn't take much effort to browse the web to find that. There are links below from ~3-4 min of browsing around.

It is obvious that you are hostile to anything that might even remotely associated w/ 'Creationist'--it must be 'silliness' without any thought or exploration of the subject or question at hand. This assumption is not a valid or rational test for truth, it merely demonstrates that you have hostile presuppositions. Perhaps in this case your hostile presuppositions are preventing you from making observations and exploring the world if they contradict your presuppositions....one area you may find interesting: 'the variable speed of light cosmology has been proposed independently by John Moffat and the two-man team of Andreas Albrecht and João Magueijo to explain the horizon problem of cosmology'


http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6092.html

math.arizona.edu/~ura/034/Schumann.Dave/VariableSpeedofLightProposal.pdf -

http://www.varsity.utoronto.ca/archives/120/oct07/scitech/faster.html

http://www.datasync.com/~rsf1/uhecrs.htm

http://www.sp-astronomia.pt/jenam2002/ws-vfc/abstracts/moffat_j.html

http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=5538

http://www.discover.com/issues/apr-03/cover/

http://glcomm.com/dupont/pastwinners.html

http://www.qiji.cn/eprint/abs/2227.html

theory.ic.ac.uk/~magueijo

www.ast.cam.ac.uk/~mim/res.html#basics
19 posted on 08/30/2006 7:14:13 PM PDT by FreedomProtector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
FWIW, here's Scientific American's version: Gamma-Ray Burst Leads Scientists to See Supernova in Action
20 posted on 08/31/2006 12:10:27 AM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson