Skip to comments.
Fury as academics claim 9/11 was 'inside job'
Daily Mail ^
| 9/5/2006
| Jaya Narain
Posted on 09/06/2006 7:45:51 AM PDT by Vasilli22
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-198 next last
Unbelievable. My question is: When you are that delusional, do you actually know you are delusional?
Be sure to check out the comments on the web page. Total whack jobs.
Article Here
1
posted on
09/06/2006 7:45:52 AM PDT
by
Vasilli22
To: Vasilli22
Total whack jobs indeed. So exactly what is it that makes them "leading" academics?
2
posted on
09/06/2006 7:47:59 AM PDT
by
Gone GF
To: Vasilli22
according to a group of leading academics.
Um, yeah sure if they say so.
3
posted on
09/06/2006 7:48:06 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: Vasilli22
The AP recently released a story where NIST and the State Dept have both set up websites to refute the conspiracy folks.
The NIST report detailing why WTC-7 fell has not yet been released however....due Jan 07.
Popluar Mechanics and John McCain have teamed up as well to combat this.
4
posted on
09/06/2006 7:48:19 AM PDT
by
gobucks
(Blissful Marriage: A result of a worldly husband's transformation into the Word's wife.)
To: Vasilli22
Bin Laden admitted it.
Is he on the payroll too?
5
posted on
09/06/2006 7:49:07 AM PDT
by
Finalapproach29er
(Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush II --> Appeasing Islam for 27 years)
To: Vasilli22
We challenge this official conspiracy theory and, by God, we're going to get to the bottom of this.This from a group that is, most likely, a bunch of idiot liberal athiests!
6
posted on
09/06/2006 7:49:43 AM PDT
by
rivercat
(Welcome to California. Now go home.)
To: Vasilli22
"Leading" academics no one has ever heard of in search of their 15 minutes. People with kids in those schools, and alumni, should make their opinions known about this kind of irresponsible craziness.
7
posted on
09/06/2006 7:50:10 AM PDT
by
3AngelaD
To: Gone GF
"Leading" in terms of the most deranged...
8
posted on
09/06/2006 7:50:29 AM PDT
by
kromike
To: Vasilli22
9
posted on
09/06/2006 7:50:36 AM PDT
by
the invisib1e hand
(live until you die. then live some more.)
To: Vasilli22
I agree that 9/11 was an inside job.
HILLARY CLINTON DID IT!
Please recognize sarcasm! I hate these scum as much as anyone. But that's my flippant answer to these punks.
The reason for this garbage is simple denial. If 9/11 was caused or allowed to happen by Bush, Cheney, et. al., then there is no real threat to us and all it would take to go back to the "glory days" of the Clinton presidency is to get rid of Bush. But if we ARE facing a genocidal terrorist threat - which we are - then we are facing a long and costly war that can't be avoided.
That, I believe, is the main explanation for these jackasses. Head in the sand. And of course others are trying to make money off it.
10
posted on
09/06/2006 7:50:36 AM PDT
by
cvq3842
To: Vasilli22
"We don't believe that 19 hijackers and a few others in a cave in Afghanistan pulled this off acting alone.
Who has claimed that such was the case?
11
posted on
09/06/2006 7:50:54 AM PDT
by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: Vasilli22
error... it's 7.5 leading scientists
12
posted on
09/06/2006 7:51:34 AM PDT
by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: gobucks
NIST is the world's expert on the behavior of fire; if they have a report to make on this, it's going to be the benchmark.
13
posted on
09/06/2006 7:53:00 AM PDT
by
Fairview
To: Vasilli22
These are just more shrills ranting for the Democrat Party. America, you better get it right. The Democrat Party is going to do both you, your family and the USA no good whatsoever. This political party called Democrat needs to be totally destroyed at the ballot box. This election is more critcal than you know. If the Democrat Party does not regain the house and the senate, it will come apart and slowly destroy itself. So, all you Freepers thinking about sitting out this election better take care of business and vote for the Pubbies, even though theye are whimps of the first order.
To: gobucks
Calling these nut jobs academics is as off-base as calling Islam a Religion of Peace. < / sarcasm>
15
posted on
09/06/2006 7:53:34 AM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Crime would drop like a sprung trap-door if we brought back good old-fashioned hangings.)
To: Vasilli22
He maintains jet fuel does not burn at temperatures high enough to melt steel beams And this guy is a Physics professor? I got news for you, it doesn't need to melt it you idiot, it just needs to weaken it.
I am shocked and ashamed that a professor from my own alma mater, BYU, would take such a position and then trumpet it and drag the good name of that school through the mud. He needs to go post haste.
16
posted on
09/06/2006 7:54:16 AM PDT
by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
To: Finalapproach29er
Bin Laden admitted it. Is he on the payroll too?According to these "leading" experts, he is probably just a puppet of the Bush regime.
17
posted on
09/06/2006 7:54:44 AM PDT
by
Vasilli22
(http://www.richardfest.blogspot.com/)
To: Vasilli22
What kind of "acedemics" would advance such a silly notion of wishful thinking (on their part)?
If this is what passes for "acedemics" then I should make a claim for a full department head post at Harvard for a salary of 200 K/year.
Just damn.
18
posted on
09/06/2006 7:54:45 AM PDT
by
BamaAndy
(Heart & Iron--the story of America through an ordinary family. ISBN: 1-4137-5397-3)
To: 3AngelaD
""Leading" academics no one has ever heard of in search of their 15 minutes. " I haven't looked up the whole list, but Steve Jones IS a highly respected physicist--having researched and published the only "recognized by physicists" form of "Cold Fusion" (i.e. muon-moderated). Hard to believe that he would get involved in flakery like this.
To: Vasilli22
He maintains jet fuel does not burn at temperatures high enough to melt steel beams and claims horizontal puffs of smoke seen during the collapse of the towers are indicative of controlled explosions used to bring down the towers. I want to see one of these academics explain how a "controlled implosion" starts from the top of a building, since that is how the building fell. Also explain how months worth of explosives were set without being caught and structural, load bearing columns were cut and notched all while thousands and thousands of people worked in the buildings?
These f&%*ing, hate-America first DUmba$$es should be hanged for treason.
IMO of course
20
posted on
09/06/2006 7:55:08 AM PDT
by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(My Pug is On Her War Footing (and moving to Texas!))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-198 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson