[gobucks]

The AP recently released a story where NIST and the State Dept have both set up websites to refute the conspiracy folks.

The NIST report detailing why WTC-7 fell has not yet been released however....due Jan 07.

Popluar Mechanics and John McCain have teamed up as well to combat this.

[Fairview]

NIST is the world's expert on the behavior of fire; if they have a report to make on this, it's going to be the benchmark.

[Vigilanteman]

Calling these nut jobs academics is as off-base as calling Islam a Religion of Peace. < / sarcasm>

[cvq3842]

WTC 7. I was scheduling an appointment there, which was obviously postponed, the day it fell. not terribly relevant, but I still get the creeps when i think of it.

I am no demolitions expert, but I have to throw in my two cents. Any technical corrections would be appreciated.

First, it's funny how the conspiracy moonbats talk out of both sides of their mouths. First they say the towers could not have fallen straight down from the plane and gasoline damage. Then they say why did WTC 7 fall, since it was not hit by a plane? Point two refutes point one. The towers did not fall 100% straight down, on the footprint. Look at the tapes. I'm sure debris hit WTC 7.

Also, something I really didn't focus on. Bombs and explosions kill partly by sheer concussion. A wall of air pushed out by a bomb would be like a brick wall, to a degree. Something you don't want running into you. I would imagine all that jet fuel would create a huge shock wave when it exploded. That's also probably why al-Zarquai (sp? who cares? he's in Hell) looked like he was "beaten up" in the death photos. Concussion alone could do that.

Again, thanks in advance for any corrections.