Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: For lieutenant governor - McClintock could elevate a job Bustamante lowered.
Long Beach Press-Telegram ^ | September 6, 2006

Posted on 09/06/2006 11:24:04 PM PDT by calcowgirl

Voters may best remember state Sen. Tom McClintock, R-Thousand Oaks, from the surreal 2003 recall election in which voters removed former Gov. Gray Davis and replaced him with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

McClintock, who many wags viewed as the most qualified candidate, came in a respectable third place behind Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante and well ahead, we might add, of the likes of former child star Gary Coleman and porn king Larry Flynt.

But instead of engendering bitterness, or disappearing from the radar (but not the payroll) like Bustamante, McClintock went to work with Schwarzenegger on scrapping the car tax. McClintock, of course, had clashed with Davis over the car tax in 2000 and was more than happy to shepherd Schwarzenegger's proposal.

McClintock has also helped find $1.1 billion in tax rebates for Californians who overpaid and is a strong proponent of lowering taxes and state debt to seed economic growth. Deeply committed to free-market philosophies, he consistently votes against taxes and fees and shameful borrowing in a debt-addicted state where every program is more "essential" than fiscal responsibility.

McClintock and Schwarzenegger share an interest in improving the state's transportation system - the No. 1 issue in California. There is no greater economic SigAlert than slowing the movement of people to work and goods to market.

The senator supports Proposition 1A, which would amend the state Constitution to prevent the state from raiding transportation funding for other uses, but is consistent with his anti-debt history in opposing the transportation bond measures.

McClintock understands the important roles the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles play in the global economy and correctly sees them as an economic opportunity rather than as the burden that many on the left consider them. In a speech to the Pacific Maritime Association last year in Long Beach, McClintock called shipping the "life's blood of the planet" and "because of increasingly meddlesome governmental regulation, reliable, efficient and economical access to California ports is now coming into question."

The fine working relationship between the governor and McClintock could elevate the role of lieutenant governor from a seat-warmer on state boards to that of adviser. We're afraid that won't happen if Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi, a Democrat, wins the slot, meaning business as usual for the No. 2 state office.

The Democrats have already turned the job into a punch line with Bustamante, who almost never meets with Schwarzenegger, and are shamelessly supporting his bid for insurance commissioner, a job for which he is not qualified.

McClintock would reverse recent history by doing much more than taking up space.


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: bustamante; calelection; mcclintock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 09/06/2006 11:24:06 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604; CaliGirl-R; Ladycalif; jokar; vets son; FairOpinion; doodlelady; antceecee; ...
PING!

Tom McClintock for Lieutenant Governor of California

McClintock Ping List.
Please freepmail me if you want on or off this list

2 posted on 09/06/2006 11:24:38 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

I think he will bring dignity back to that office after others have stained it for sure.

He is more than capable no doubt.


3 posted on 09/06/2006 11:26:07 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
From Email:
A Message from State Senator Tom McClintock

The Labor Day Holiday Weekend traditionally marks the end of summer vacations, and it’s a time historically when gasoline prices dip in price and traffic commutes are more congested as people settle into their routines at home, work and school.

Over the coming weeks, as we hope to avoid the potholes and the tail lights in front of us, there may be an opportunity to contemplate on the state’s overall transportation needs and challenges. I thought it might be a good time to share my thoughts on California’s transportation issues.

This November, voters will be asked to decide on two transportation measures. For years, the Legislature has raided our highway taxes for general fund spending. That’s why I support Proposition 1A Transportation Funding Protection. Though it’s more window dressing than relief, this measure makes it marginally harder to do so.

Prop. 1B Transportation Bond: Although some of this money is for long overdue road construction, most goes for equipment, maintenance and social programs that will be obsolete decades before our children have finished paying off the debt. As a result, I’m opposed.

I believe that before we pass a transportation bond, we need to spend the highway taxes Californians are already paying for our highways.

California ranks 43rd among the 50 states in our per capita spending for our highways and we have the third highest gas tax in the country. The deplorable condition of California’s roads is not the fault of taxpayers for not paying enough taxes—you and I are paying for a first-rate road system. The fault is government continues to siphon off billions of those dollars for purposes unrelated to our highways. That’s why I urge you to support Proposition 1A.

Working together we can demand that our government does what every family does every day "work hard, waste not, and live within its means.”

Sincerely,

Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Tom McClintock


4 posted on 09/06/2006 11:27:27 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Better than Bustamante! LOL.


5 posted on 09/06/2006 11:28:59 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Pray he wins. Keep praying.


6 posted on 09/06/2006 11:33:04 PM PDT by I_Love_My_Husband (I live in Santa Rosa now!!! I've escaped SF - FINALLY!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
The dead cows Bustamante used to cut up as a failed butcher could do a better job than Bustamante...

At least Mr, McClintock will IMO act with some dignity and professionalism in that office.

The problem for Tom is that after Arnold finishes the next term, Villaraigosa (who will run for the White House some day) will be running for Governor and that will screw Tom because of the popularity and success of Villaraigosa.

Unless Villaraigosa screws up royally, Tom is going to have a heck of a time finding a job politically higher up without some Presidential appointment.

7 posted on 09/06/2006 11:33:51 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

How do we take our state back?

We've been invaded by Mexico and China and they vote (illegally), but they vote. And then the leftards.

How do we make a difference here? There's a Sonoma County GOP office to re-elect Arnie, but after he goes, then...what?


8 posted on 09/06/2006 11:37:03 PM PDT by I_Love_My_Husband (I live in Santa Rosa now!!! I've escaped SF - FINALLY!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband
We take our state back fully by switching maybe 4% of the people who vote Democrat to Republican.

Obstacles to achieving this outcome are the tools of the Democrat party which consist of.
#1 Giving away the treasury to buy the votes through government employment, teacher's union and social program dependence.
#2 Creating more and possible all things through the government in the goal of a European styled socialism.
Universal socialized medicine will be the next big goal in trying to create a 50% +1 majority for them in all elections.

What has been good for us on our side?
#1 We show only Republicans are grown up enough to protect the country and handle a war.
#2 Anyone associated with being in business knows taxes come from the private sector and that government creates nothing.
#3 The observation that anywhere in the private sector where unions have been, businesses have had to close down and pensions flushed.

It's real easy to be a Democrat.
You stand for nothing and offer a big pile of other people's cash as a bribe to get yourself elected.
Meanwhile the Republican will be offer personal responsibility, and common sense.

Freebies vs Responsibility...
Which is the tougher sell?
9 posted on 09/06/2006 11:44:28 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

You have a typo or two, but your message is right on.


10 posted on 09/07/2006 12:05:29 AM PDT by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Henchster

I know, late night and typing are NOT a strength of mine.

Nighty night.


11 posted on 09/07/2006 12:07:44 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Thank you!


12 posted on 09/07/2006 2:00:33 AM PDT by Seadog Bytes (OPM - The Liberal 'solution' to every societal problem. (Other People's Money))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

BTTT


13 posted on 09/07/2006 3:01:07 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Thanks for this one. McClintock BUMP!


14 posted on 09/07/2006 5:24:49 AM PDT by truthkeeper (It's the borders, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Holy s***, this was an editorial endorsement, right?


15 posted on 09/07/2006 8:40:53 AM PDT by StoneColdGOP (The Minutemen: Doing the Job Bush Won't Do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

the most qualified candidate in the 2003 Recall election.

also the most abused, and oddly enough, by a lot of FR FRequenters, Go figure.


I guess Q as in Q factor was more important to folks more than qualified. .. the cost of that decision has already cost us close to 100 Billion dollars in budget increaes and new debt, with more to come..

Oh well..

2 months to Judgment Day


16 posted on 09/07/2006 9:51:27 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ......Help the "Pendleton 8' and families -- http://www.freerepublic.com/~normsrevenge/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Ping for McClintock!( who should have been Governor to begin with!!!)


17 posted on 09/07/2006 9:52:58 AM PDT by pollywog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP
... this was an editorial endorsement, right?

I assume so, yes. But it wasn't listed as such, so I just posted the info they had. The URL indicates in was categorized as "Opinion."

18 posted on 09/07/2006 10:20:02 AM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband
How do we make a difference here?

California Conservatives missed a HUGE opportunity by not supporting Arnold's Special Election.
Many "true conservatives" here let bitterness hand victory to the liberal unions, abortionists, etc.

19 posted on 09/07/2006 10:40:36 AM PDT by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

I hope Tom wins but I think he has a very big hurdle. If he can win it would be a real plus for the GOP and portend good things in the future.


20 posted on 09/07/2006 11:41:16 AM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson