This is a superb, comprehensive editorial worthy of a careful read. For example:
"...All of the world’s major intelligence agencies, probably to include most agents in Saddam Hussein’s own Mukhabarat as well as his own generals, believed Iraq had an active WMD program. He did, as has been recently shown, have existing stockpiles of up to 700 chemical projectiles.
"...Iraq attempted to buy uranium in Niger. The outing of Valerie Plame was not a White House plot.
"...Saddam was winning the sanctions war. He had throughly corrupted the United Nations food-for-oil program and Europe was pushing to eliminate the crumbling sanctions regime. Had Saddam been allowed to remain in power, the likelihood is that he would have resumed production and development of WMD....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: shrinkermd
Democrats for Truth = few in number.
=== placemark === want to read later
2 posted on
09/09/2006 6:15:12 PM PDT by
onyx
(1 Billion Muslims -- "if" 10% are fundamentalists, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
To: shrinkermd
In addition, the U.S. was spending about $10 billion per year enforcing the no-fly zones in Iraq and the Iraqis were very frequently challenging U.S. supremacy in the UN mandated no-fly zones.
To: doc1019
Democrats for truth = Oxymoron.
4 posted on
09/09/2006 6:17:39 PM PDT by
doc1019
To: shrinkermd
6 posted on
09/09/2006 6:21:17 PM PDT by
woofie
To: shrinkermd
"RATs FOR TRUTH"!?!?
Sorry...this does NOT COMPUTE!!!
RATs can't handle the truth!!
7 posted on
09/09/2006 6:23:13 PM PDT by
Howie66
("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people.")
To: shrinkermd
Democrats for truth....truly an oxymoron.
What's next?....Honorable Liberal Democrats for the USA?
This is really strange.....smells like a Clintoon trick. :^/
8 posted on
09/09/2006 6:23:43 PM PDT by
skinkinthegrass
(Just b/c your paranoid; Doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you. :^)
To: shrinkermd
"Democrats for truth"
Might have been possible, once upon a time, long long ago...
But today? No.
9 posted on
09/09/2006 6:23:51 PM PDT by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Iran Azadi | SONY: 5yst3m 0wn3d, N0t Y0urs | UN: Useless Nations)
To: shrinkermd
"Saddam’s regime had contact with al-Qaeda, as his own documents attest. "
And William Clinton said he attacked a suspected chemical weapons plant because he had intel data that it was being used by Hussain, in collusion with al Quaeda- he mentioned growing concern over the links between the two.
10 posted on
09/09/2006 6:24:19 PM PDT by
DBrow
To: shrinkermd
Good post, Shrinkermd but don't forget:
Saddam's goons fired SAMs at NATO jets patrolling the no-fly zone in Iraq for several years, up until we invaded Iraq and removed the threat.
The "dims for truth" completely ignore this well-documented fact.
11 posted on
09/09/2006 6:24:20 PM PDT by
goresalooza
(Nurses Rock!)
To: shrinkermd
I guess if you call movies like "Fahrenheit 911" the "truth", then yeah, maybe the democRATs are for truth.
But in this case - when it gets legs and actually produces fruit, I will believe it. Otherwise, I firmly stand that "Democrat" and "lies" are synonyms.
12 posted on
09/09/2006 6:24:31 PM PDT by
TheBattman
(I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
To: shrinkermd
Democrats for truth Are called "Republicans."
13 posted on
09/09/2006 6:25:04 PM PDT by
freedumb2003
(the war on poverty should include health club memberships for the morbidly poor)
To: shrinkermd
Terrific column! Thanks for posting it!!
15 posted on
09/09/2006 6:27:09 PM PDT by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Iran Azadi | SONY: 5yst3m 0wn3d, N0t Y0urs | UN: Useless Nations)
To: shrinkermd
Democrats for truth, isn't that some kind of oxymoron?
16 posted on
09/09/2006 6:28:07 PM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: shrinkermd
17 posted on
09/09/2006 6:28:07 PM PDT by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: shrinkermd
The Boston Herald must feel like the lone voice in the wilderness at times.
18 posted on
09/09/2006 6:28:20 PM PDT by
Past Your Eyes
(Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
To: shrinkermd
Outstanding read.
Thanks for posting this.
19 posted on
09/09/2006 6:32:17 PM PDT by
upchuck
(Q:Why does President Bush support amnesty for illegal aliens? A:Read this: http://tinyurl.com/nyvno)
To: shrinkermd
It is becoming increasingly clear that democrats are worse
than the terrorists, they are undermining America.
At least with the muslims you know they want to kill you.
Democrats are subversive they want to rape your childrens minds and give our country to the first totalitarian they can find.
20 posted on
09/09/2006 6:32:26 PM PDT by
claptrap
(optional tag-line under reconsideration)
To: shrinkermd
Grand slam!
Here's another Dem challenge to the President that we should all throw back in their faces regarding "the path to 9/11":
"Admit you made mistakes"!
21 posted on
09/09/2006 6:34:22 PM PDT by
kenavi
(Save romance. Stop teen sex.)
To: shrinkermd
Clinton is concerned a TV dramatization will become the accepted version of history.It will be accepted unless people successfully put forth other ideas that are more acceptable. Clinton & al. will have a hard time disputing the central idea: democrats are demonstrably corrupt, untrustworthy and unqualified to lead the country.
22 posted on
09/09/2006 6:35:25 PM PDT by
Tax Government
(Defeat Islamic imperialists and their democRAT cheerleaders)
To: shrinkermd
Democrats for truth
23 posted on
09/09/2006 6:36:07 PM PDT by
Fiddlstix
(Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
