It's amazing: if 9/11 had not happened these democrats bozos and their media toadies like Anderson would have absolutely nothing going for them. Anderson runs through the usual talking points about health care, bin Laden, Saddam, the Bush daughters, the draft and ends up with this gem:
"There were 16 million Americans fighting to keep the world safe for democracy in World War II. "
Of course, the war to make the "world safe for democracy" was WWI.
To: Chi-townChief; Howlin; Liz; ALOHA RONNIE; MurryMom
2 posted on
09/10/2006 7:50:44 AM PDT by
Libloather
(Just declare the UN as an enemy combatant and kick their ass out of this country!)
To: Chi-townChief
Cabinet members and neo-con sycophants would have us believe we're safer or, depending on political expediencies, not that safe. According to the president's pre-9/11 anniversary speeches on the progress of the war on terror, we're safer than we were before the attacks but not yet safe enough to steer clear of his failed stay-the-course strategy. As Bush explains it, al-Qaida's leadership is decimated but remains dangerous enough to destroy the entire civilized world. These are concepts that apparently are beyond the comprehension of Democrats. They actually cannot understand how any of this could be true.
Does anyone truly believe that we'd be any safer with a left-wing "Do Nothing But Posture and Bloviate" strategy?
3 posted on
09/10/2006 7:53:33 AM PDT by
IronJack
(ALL)
To: Chi-townChief
It's the Liberals who are out there telling us we're not safer not Conservatives.
4 posted on
09/10/2006 7:55:36 AM PDT by
kcordell
To: Chi-townChief
"Watch the politically timed color alert rise and fall on cue."
Tell that to Spain.
5 posted on
09/10/2006 7:59:43 AM PDT by
Berlin_Freeper
(ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
To: Chi-townChief
Bush campaigns on reality. The Dems fear reality, in every way, shape, or form.
7 posted on
09/10/2006 8:05:00 AM PDT by
LS
To: Chi-townChief
....failed stay-the-course strategy.The Dems favorite tactic. Repeat something often enough (evidence not needed) and see if you can fool most of the people most of the time.
8 posted on
09/10/2006 8:10:08 AM PDT by
DuxFan4ever
(The next rational liberal I meet will be the first.)
To: Chi-townChief
Better fear than head-up-the-hindy denial.
10 posted on
09/10/2006 8:13:40 AM PDT by
tkathy
(Einstein: Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance.)
To: Chi-townChief
I'm trying to figure this out ...
Question: Are we safer now after 5 years?
Bush: Generally, yes we are.
Democrats: No!! We are LESS SAFE!!! .... oh and BUSH is using the politics of FEAR!!!
To: AbsoluteJustice; Augie76; Barnacle; BeAllYouCanBe; BillyBoy; Bismarck; bourbon; ...
To: Chi-townChief
Bush isn't running. Clinton is STILL running.
14 posted on
09/10/2006 10:00:26 AM PDT by
weegee
(Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
To: Chi-townChief
Monroe Anderson: "President Bush and his chorus of Republican pols, Cabinet members and neo-con sycophants..."
Hi Everyone!
I'm Monroe Anderson,
and I'm An Idiot.
15 posted on
09/10/2006 10:08:16 AM PDT by
Condor51
("Alot" is NOT a word and doesn't mean "many". It is 'a lot', two separate words.)
To: Chi-townChief
...while Clinton parties in Toronto, the city where the following night at approximately the same time as the TV show, the movie DOAP happens to premiere at an International Film Festival?
This was a "birthday party"?
16 posted on
09/10/2006 4:12:47 PM PDT by
combat_boots
(The MSM: State run Democrat media masquerading as corporations)
To: Chi-townChief
I find the timing of 9/11 to be very suspicious.
/moonbat
17 posted on
09/10/2006 8:44:49 PM PDT by
freedomlover
(Sorry, a tagline occurred. The tagline has been logged.)
To: Chi-townChief
re: "we're safer than we were before the attacks but not yet safe enough to steer clear"
There are at least two totally different world views.
The STATIC view says that if we do specific things we can solve a problem. If we have the right foreign policy and do the right things in the UN, then everybody will love us and the problem is solved. The same holds true for domestic policy. The pie of wealth is a fixed size to ber cut into pieces of equal size. If we transfer money from the wealthy to the poor then will have solved the problem of poverty. And if we outlaw racism then that problem is solved.
The DYNAMIC view says that WE MUST BE EVER VIGILANT. The poor are always with us. The pie is not a fixed size.
Conclusions, opinons, actions are the result of accepting either one pre-supposition or the other.
To: Chi-townChief
I see that the 9/11 anniversary has brought out quite a few BDS afflicted Drive-By Media hacks.
19 posted on
09/11/2006 5:49:48 AM PDT by
PogySailor
(Media bias? What media bias?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson