I'm just surprised the US wasn't attacked with more force while he was in office.
The US was attacked more while Clinton was in office, he just lied about it. The GREAT CONSPIRACY THEORY BS of the 90's? IT wasn't hard to figure out, it's just that you and millions others don't believe it, not yet that it.
Oklahoma City? WHY would a woman reporter write a book detailing that dozens of witnesses swore that McVeigh and Nichols associated with eight Iraqi's during the time leading up to April 1995 when the Federal Building in OKC was bombed. Why would experts say that the truck bomb did not have enough explosive force to destroy the building? Why?
Why in July, 1996 would HUNDREDS of witnesses say they saw a missile shoot down a passenger jet and kill hundreds of people? Why would they take out a full page ad in 2000 and ask WHY their government agencies lied about what the witnesses say they saw?
IS it because YOU don't believe that old arguement that our goverment just couldn't pull off that level of deception without someone talking?
Once you give it some thought, you'll see that there were more attacks than you believed. WHY WTC bombing #1 in 1993 and no more attacks until the late 1990's?
It all fits together so nicely when you finally agree that things like Sandy Berger stuffing TOP SECRET documents into his underwear, Jamie Gorelick on the 9/11 Commission, and newspaper ads like the attached link:
http://www.twa800.com/eyewitnesses.htm
There is only ONE reasonable conclusion; and that is your government is lying about what happened. IS it a vast conspiracy? The clear answer it is not, it only takes a few powerful insiders to pull off something like this: Richard Clark, Jamie Gorelick, Sandy Berger, Bill Clinton are the main characters here.
These people aren't worried about how history will judge them, they are worried how high they will hang if the American people start thinking clearly again.