Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul Ross

As has become apparent with Hezbollah, the regime in Tehran is willing to provide sophisticated weaponry to non-state actors and to sanction its use. Any attack by the U.S. or Israel, or indeed a coalition, would have to take into account increased activity on the part of Iranian proxies against both military and civil targets. These threats could range far beyond the Middle East.

Quite frankly, it would be better for the US and Isreal to
attack Iran now and then deal with these proxies as they expose themselves.

Is there a point to waiting till they become strong enough
to defeat us?


9 posted on 09/11/2006 5:05:30 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tet68

"Quite frankly, it would be better for the US and Isreal to attack Iran now and then deal with these proxies as they expose themselves. "

I believe Michael Corleone once said, "today we settle old scores."

I would launch an all out attack on everything Al Queada/Hezbollah/Hamas/Abu Sayyif/Irans Nukes and air defenses and Syrias military

One massive strike. Then I would go to the UN and declare that all scores are settled. If there is another attack against Israel or US interests, everything relating to radical Islam wil be destroyed including Mecca.

Now encourage all Muslims not willing to conform to western civilization to go back to their own countries.


40 posted on 09/12/2006 5:50:08 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz ("For seven million extra, we could have avoided a billion dollar WOT.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson