Replies

The double talk, deceptions, and deliberately misleading stage managed techniques that proped up the Clinton presidency for eight years (enthusiastically amplified without challenge by our idiot media), are the same techniques now utilized by forked tongue front groups, and fellow travellers who are hindering and hamstringing US efforts to prevent jihadist mayhem in our airplanes, office buildings, subways, trains, schools, and government offices, such as CAIR, and the entire "Bush is wiretapping" crowd. At their root these are the worst kind of techniques that trademark the worst kind of totalitarian movements. For such groups, ideology is only a front as well, behind it all is personal depravity, psychopathic pathology, widespread perversion, such as the twisted and strange hidden toxic world of the elite leadership of the infamous National Socialist Germand Workers Party. In the current Pope, one is confronted with the opposite of such derangement and calculated posturing. The pope has been an intelligent and honest spokesman advocating deeply held beliefs based upon an authentic commitment to carefully developed humanitarian values. CAIR announces him "inaccurate and devisive", Iran denouces him as "islamophobic" and the world press gleefully reports his apology and blames the violence on him. A hallmark of these people is their complete disdain for truth.

The Clintons are drawn from this barrel of rotten apples, and once selected, the more one tries to find any benefit, the more they end up covered by the rotting slimey irredeemable scum.

Islamophobic

As used by the islamists, the word is meant to convey a racist, irrational, abnormal fear. It is used to defuse the opposition.

It will become increasing clear to those capable of critical thinking that the fear is none of these things.

Fear of the islamofascist terrorist -- indeed, maybe even fear of Islam, itself -- will increasingly be seen as appropriate, adaptive, crucial to our survival.

pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic
WHY THE LEFT IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA

by Mia T, 5.15.04

As long as you've got a rich man on your arm, you don't need a big bag.
--Elizabeth Rickard

The $100 billion Iraqi Oil for Food program was by far the largest relief operation in the history of the United Nations. By extension, it's rapidly becoming the U.N.'s largest-ever scandal....
Those included rewarding friends and allies world-wide with oil allocations on very favorable terms, as well as extracting large kickbacks from oil traders and suppliers of humanitarian goods....
There can be little doubt that U.N. mismanagement contributed greatly to the negative perception of the anti-Saddam containment policy. There is also little doubt that the reward and kickback scheme--as well the possibility of exposure--was a factor as some countries weighed whether to back U.S.-led regime change in Iraq. There is even reason to suspect that some of the Saddam friends and allies who benefited may have been members of the U.N. Secretariat.
Oil for Scandal
The Wall Street Journal Editorial Page
Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:01 a.m.

eave it to the French to make pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic all the rage.

They and their moneygrubbing, Oil-for-Food defrauding cohorts abroad, and their power-hungry would-be terrorist sympathizers here, are all sporting "THE LOOK."

(How many of those oh so trendy Kerry-clinton-Kennedy hate-America, blame-America-first sound bites will Al-Jazeera broadcast today?)

The trusty triad's half-truths, exaggerations and outright lies, confounded by fog of war, vagaries of peace and uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds, remind us that things are not always what they first seem. The UN Oil-for-Food scandal, for example, has shown us it was not "going to war with Iraq" that was "all about oil," but rather, "not going to war with Iraq." The Left, we now see, had that one, (as they have most things), exactly backward.

The dernier cri of seditious and corrupt Leftists everywhere, pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic renders the Left, irrespective of policy, no less dangerous to Western civilization than the terrorists they aid and abet.