Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Officials: Test All Americans For HIV (including 13 year-olds)
CBS/AP ^ | 09/21/06

Posted on 09/21/2006 12:41:42 PM PDT by presidio9

All Americans between the ages of 13 and 64 should be routinely tested for HIV to help catch infections earlier and stop the spread of the deadly virus, federal health officials recommended Thursday.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says Americans should have an AIDS test during their annual doctor's visit, along with other procedures they might normally have, reported CBS News' Cami McCormick.

"We know that many HIV infected people seek health care and they don't get tested. And many people are not diagnosed until late in the course of their illness, when they're already sick with HIV-related conditions," said Dr. Timothy Mastro, acting director of the CDC's division of HIV/AIDS prevention.

"By identifying people earlier through a screening program, we'll allow them to access life-extending therapy, and also through prevention services, learn how to avoid transmitting HIV infection to others," he said.

The announcement was hailed by some HIV patient advocates and health policy experts. They said the guidelines could help end the stigma of HIV testing and lead to needed care for an estimated 250,000 Americans who do not yet know they have the disease.

"I think it's an incredible advance. I think it's courageous on the part of the CDC," said A. David Paltiel, a health policy expert at the Yale University School of Medicine.

The recommendations are not legally binding, but they influence what doctors do and what health insurance programs cover.

Some physicians groups predict the recommendations will be challenging to implement, involving time for testing, counseling and revising consent procedures.

And some doctors wonder if testing people beyond high-risk groups justifies the cost, reported McCormick.

"Are doctors going to do it? Probably not," said Dr. Larry Fields, president of the American Academy of Family Physicians.

But the recommendations were endorsed by the American Medical Association, which urged physicians to comply.

"This is important public health strategy to stop the spread of HIV," Dr. Nancy Nielsen, a Buffalo, New York-based physician who sits on the AMA's governing board, said in a statement.

Previously, the CDC recommended routine testing for those at high risk for catching the virus, such as intravenous drug users and gay men, and for hospitals and certain other institutions serving areas where HIV is common. It also recommends testing for all pregnant women.

Under the new guidelines, patients would be tested for HIV as part of a standard battery of tests they receive when they go for urgent or emergency care, or even during a routine physical.

Patients would not get tested every year: Repeated, annual testing would only be recommended only for those at high risk.

There would be no consent form specifically for the HIV test; it would be covered in a clinic or hospital's standard care consent form. Patients would be allowed to decline the testing.

CDC officials have been working on revised recommendations for about three years, and sought input from more than 100 organizations, including doctors' associations and HIV patient advocacy groups. The CDC presented planned revisions at a scientific conference in February.

Since then, the CDC has strengthened language on informed consent to make sure that no one is tested without their knowledge, and emphasized the need for doctors to provide information on HIV tests and the meaning of positive and negative results.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: aids; aidsgayplague; aidstesting; cdc; celebrateperversity; diseasecontrol; dnctalkingpoints; hiv; hivaids; homonannystate; homosexualagenda; lavendermafia; publichealth; quarantine; revisionisthistory; sexpositiveagenda; sexualizingchildren; socializedmedicine; taxdollarsatwork; teensex; testallhomos; youpayforthis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Grampa Dave; EdReform; little jeremiah; Coleus; wideawake

ping


21 posted on 09/21/2006 12:54:53 PM PDT by presidio9 (Make Mohammed's day: Shoot a nun in the back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Why?
Isn't AIDS a politically correct badge of honor anymore?

If one is interested in stamping out a disease, why not FIRST attack the source causes of the disease?

Why not outlaw GAY Bath/Whore Houses?
Why not strongly prosecute drug USERS, not just drug sellers.
Why not stop spending BILLIONS of taxpayer money on supporting and medicating drug addicted brain burned out dredges of society alive? Let nature take its course...

Once a person has been informed they have AIDS, why are they punished with a slap on the wrist for KNOWINGLY having sex with the unsuspecting? This is attempted murder!

Why must Medical workers in Hospitals not be WARNED they are dealing with an AIDS infected patient..
For decades -- this was not permitted, is it still the case?

Naaah, we're not interested in fighting AIDS.
The Gay Agenda is to have taxpayers finance their specific medical need due to their perverted choices..

F'em.....uh, never mind -- forget I said that.

Semper Fi
22 posted on 09/21/2006 12:55:27 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

I think he should be deprived of his life.


23 posted on 09/21/2006 12:55:37 PM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: brwnsuga; presidio9

I don't see doctors reasonably 'forcing' this on families. For one thing, it can lay dormant for up to 10 years. False positives would happen, probably almost as often as they do in pregnancy home tests.


24 posted on 09/21/2006 12:57:39 PM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
Anyone who sexually molests a five year old should be deprived of their life.
25 posted on 09/21/2006 1:00:35 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
Anyone who sexually molests a five year old should be deprived of their life.

Especially because history has told us that these monsters can not be cured. Rehabilitation of pedophiles is a myth.

26 posted on 09/21/2006 1:02:14 PM PDT by presidio9 (Make Mohammed's day: Shoot a nun in the back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Rehabilitation of pedophiles is a myth

...not true.... studies have shown that death causes pedophiles not to repeat their crimes


27 posted on 09/21/2006 1:06:12 PM PDT by brwnsuga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I've been tested...

The VA does this for free and usually does not make it voluntary. They do it for other reasons, but it's a damn good idea. People need to know when they have any STD..

28 posted on 09/21/2006 1:08:20 PM PDT by Cold Heat (I just analyze it, I did not create the mess...so go pound sand:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
False positives would happen

Sure! so they retest......

The tests are sensitive enough to detect dormancy.

29 posted on 09/21/2006 1:09:59 PM PDT by Cold Heat (I just analyze it, I did not create the mess...so go pound sand:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
I think Liberals actually encourage debauchery and hedonism because it keeps sheeple distracted so they can get and stay in office and tax and spend, tax and spend,

Nah, they do it to increase their odds of getting laid. Like bi-sexuals and Slick Willie.

30 posted on 09/21/2006 1:11:40 PM PDT by subterfuge (Do your part to educate a Democrat and keep on FReeping!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat

I thought the T4 levels had to be significantly low to detect presence of the virus...?


31 posted on 09/21/2006 1:11:48 PM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

~snorrfle!~


32 posted on 09/21/2006 1:12:54 PM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: brwnsuga
Has she ever received a shot? A immunization? Been to the dentist?

You cannot get it from a toilet seat, but there are many ways.

Just like the story today about the teacher who used a single sharp to have a class draw a drop of blood.

33 posted on 09/21/2006 1:13:35 PM PDT by Cold Heat (I just analyze it, I did not create the mess...so go pound sand:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Patients would not get tested every year: Repeated, annual testing would only be recommended only for those at high risk.

I'd be willing to bet a majority of the high risk population doesn't have a regular physician they see annually.

34 posted on 09/21/2006 1:15:31 PM PDT by siunevada (If we learn nothing from history, what's the point of having one? - Peggy Hill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
No, that;s not my understanding. They can test within weeks/days of first exposure, and they can look for different identifiers that show up at different stages. I understand the accuracy is almost 100% now.
35 posted on 09/21/2006 1:15:58 PM PDT by Cold Heat (I just analyze it, I did not create the mess...so go pound sand:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

No, sure didn't, but I will check it out.
Thanks...I just got back in. ;-)

But it's amazing how people think anymore.
There was once a time not long ago.........
That folks would be ashamed to do a lot of what's done now.

And not just sex, but perverted on top of that........and with the wrong people! (gender/age)
And using sex as a weapon. Shaking my head.....

Depravity runs rampant.


36 posted on 09/21/2006 1:18:21 PM PDT by LadyPilgrim ((Sealed my Pardon with HIS BLOOD!!! Hallelujah!!! What a Savior))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LadyPilgrim; LucyT

I know. Lucy T just posted one about a man raping a 5-yr-old, knowing he was positive. Sick.


37 posted on 09/21/2006 1:19:56 PM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
I don't see how the testing will prevent any spread of the disease. They're presupposing that if a person knows s/he/s positive s/he will refrain. That's a big stretch of the imagination, in my book.

Agreed.

Furthermore, by offering "life extending therapies," they will only give them more time to infect others. Which they will do. Everyone in this country already knows how to stop the spread of AIDS. They just can't be bothered to do it.

38 posted on 09/21/2006 1:21:57 PM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Patients would be allowed to decline the testing.

For now.

39 posted on 09/21/2006 1:23:44 PM PDT by my_pointy_head_is_sharp (Pornography kills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat

HIV is a blood born illness facilitated by the exchange of bodily fluids. It is highly unlikely that a child would get HIV from receiving immunizations or from the dentist since they use sterile instruments.


40 posted on 09/21/2006 1:26:11 PM PDT by brwnsuga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson