Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Officials: Test All Americans For HIV (including 13 year-olds)
CBS/AP ^ | 09/21/06

Posted on 09/21/2006 12:41:42 PM PDT by presidio9

All Americans between the ages of 13 and 64 should be routinely tested for HIV to help catch infections earlier and stop the spread of the deadly virus, federal health officials recommended Thursday.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says Americans should have an AIDS test during their annual doctor's visit, along with other procedures they might normally have, reported CBS News' Cami McCormick.

"We know that many HIV infected people seek health care and they don't get tested. And many people are not diagnosed until late in the course of their illness, when they're already sick with HIV-related conditions," said Dr. Timothy Mastro, acting director of the CDC's division of HIV/AIDS prevention.

"By identifying people earlier through a screening program, we'll allow them to access life-extending therapy, and also through prevention services, learn how to avoid transmitting HIV infection to others," he said.

The announcement was hailed by some HIV patient advocates and health policy experts. They said the guidelines could help end the stigma of HIV testing and lead to needed care for an estimated 250,000 Americans who do not yet know they have the disease.

"I think it's an incredible advance. I think it's courageous on the part of the CDC," said A. David Paltiel, a health policy expert at the Yale University School of Medicine.

The recommendations are not legally binding, but they influence what doctors do and what health insurance programs cover.

Some physicians groups predict the recommendations will be challenging to implement, involving time for testing, counseling and revising consent procedures.

And some doctors wonder if testing people beyond high-risk groups justifies the cost, reported McCormick.

"Are doctors going to do it? Probably not," said Dr. Larry Fields, president of the American Academy of Family Physicians.

But the recommendations were endorsed by the American Medical Association, which urged physicians to comply.

"This is important public health strategy to stop the spread of HIV," Dr. Nancy Nielsen, a Buffalo, New York-based physician who sits on the AMA's governing board, said in a statement.

Previously, the CDC recommended routine testing for those at high risk for catching the virus, such as intravenous drug users and gay men, and for hospitals and certain other institutions serving areas where HIV is common. It also recommends testing for all pregnant women.

Under the new guidelines, patients would be tested for HIV as part of a standard battery of tests they receive when they go for urgent or emergency care, or even during a routine physical.

Patients would not get tested every year: Repeated, annual testing would only be recommended only for those at high risk.

There would be no consent form specifically for the HIV test; it would be covered in a clinic or hospital's standard care consent form. Patients would be allowed to decline the testing.

CDC officials have been working on revised recommendations for about three years, and sought input from more than 100 organizations, including doctors' associations and HIV patient advocacy groups. The CDC presented planned revisions at a scientific conference in February.

Since then, the CDC has strengthened language on informed consent to make sure that no one is tested without their knowledge, and emphasized the need for doctors to provide information on HIV tests and the meaning of positive and negative results.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: aids; aidsgayplague; aidstesting; cdc; celebrateperversity; diseasecontrol; dnctalkingpoints; hiv; hivaids; homonannystate; homosexualagenda; lavendermafia; publichealth; quarantine; revisionisthistory; sexpositiveagenda; sexualizingchildren; socializedmedicine; taxdollarsatwork; teensex; testallhomos; youpayforthis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last
To: ivyleaguebrat

menigitis=meningitis.

And when I said "I agree," I meant, I agree there's a difference. Not that the government is overreaching (yet). So far, all they've done is talk about it.


61 posted on 09/21/2006 2:03:01 PM PDT by ivyleaguebrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ivyleaguebrat
"I agree, but if something has no real downside, why not make it mandatory? "

Because the govt. doesn't have the authority, and I don't want them to have that authority. That will truly open a pandora's box.

62 posted on 09/21/2006 4:57:07 PM PDT by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

xrp to officials: F--K OFF


63 posted on 09/21/2006 6:29:47 PM PDT by xrp (Fox News Channel: MISSING WHITE GIRL NETWORK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat

I heard of a girl who got herpes from kissing a toilet seat.


64 posted on 09/22/2006 8:18:52 AM PDT by Paine's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ivyleaguebrat
I really don't why anyone would be against mandatory HIV testing for everyone in this country, other than its monetary cost. So far I've led a damn low-risk lifestyle, but I just don't see the downside.

Anytime you penetrate the skin you run a risk. The guy in front of you has AIDs and the nurse (public health worker/Master at Arms) gets a little confused and sticks you with the same needle. No thanks!

My brother-in-law is dying from Hep-C because of needle stick(s) as an ICU nurse.

65 posted on 09/22/2006 8:25:46 AM PDT by Paine's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson