Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Allows Suit on Light Cigarettes (Judge Jack Weinstein strikes again!)
NY Times ^ | September 25, 2006 | JEREMY W. PETERS

Posted on 09/25/2006 4:26:42 PM PDT by neverdem

A federal judge in New York today gave class-action status to a lawsuit that poses a major new threat to the tobacco industry by asserting that tobacco companies purposely misled consumers by marketing “light” cigarettes as a safer alternative to regular cigarettes.

The ruling opens the door for millions, if not tens of millions, of Americans to join the lawsuit as plaintiffs. In his ruling, Judge Jack Weinstein of the Eastern District of New York, essentially said that any United States resident who has ever purchased a cigarette labeled “light” is part of the class represented in the suit.

In the case, known by the name of the lead plaintiff, Barbara Schwab, lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that smokers were led to believe that light cigarettes, representing 45 percent of the market, were safer or less addictive than regular cigarettes, when the industry knew that was not so.

They have asked for $20 billion to $200 billion in damages. But if the case goes to trial and a jury decides against the cigarette makers, their liability could be much higher. The case was filed under the federal Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act, which entitles plaintiffs to triple damages.

The lawsuit, originally filed in 2004, names as defendants the nation’s largest tobacco companies, including Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson and Lorrilard. Some of the companies, including R.J. Reynolds and Philip Morris, said today that they planned to appeal the judge’s class-action certification.

The legal tactic of suing cigarette companies for misleading marketing practices represents a shift in strategy for lawyers who have pursued big tobacco. Previously, the main avenue of attack had been to sue for personal injuries. But many of the jury awards in those cases were thrown out or reduced on appeal.

Most recently, in July the...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: New York
KEYWORDS: buttout; democratgreed; jackweinstein; judgejackweinstein; nyfagtimes; yawn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 09/25/2006 4:26:43 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gabz; SheLion

shakedown artist ping


2 posted on 09/25/2006 4:27:59 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Whacko Jacko (Judge Jack) ping.


3 posted on 09/25/2006 4:34:37 PM PDT by ozoneliar ("The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants" -T.J.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Filthy lawyers.Even in the 1930's (any very possibly earlier than that) cigarettes were routinely referred to as "coffin nails".If smokers are looking for someone (other than themselves) to blame,look to government officials who failed to outlaw cigarettes.

Filthy,filthy lawyers!

4 posted on 09/25/2006 4:38:39 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative ("An empty limousine pulled up and Hillary Clinton got out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
They have asked for $20 billion to $200 billion in damages. But if the case goes to trial and a jury decides against the cigarette makers, their liability could be much higher. The case was filed under the federal Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act, which entitles plaintiffs to triple damages.

For this much money? Cigarette companies should have armies of assassins working overtime on lawyers.

5 posted on 09/25/2006 4:41:54 PM PDT by Centurion2000 ("Be polite and courteous, but have a plan to KILL everybody you meet.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Another extortion racket class action suit courtesy of Jackoff Weinstein.
6 posted on 09/25/2006 4:47:04 PM PDT by headstamp (Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

Why would a smoker buy light cigarettes? Maybe because the smoker knew cigarettes were dangerous to health? DUH. End of case. Thanks for allowing the light smokers into the mix yer honor.......


7 posted on 09/25/2006 4:51:07 PM PDT by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Just another Joe; CSM; lockjaw02; Publius6961; elkfersupper; nopardons; metesky; Mears; ..

Nanny State ping

Assinine ruling for an assinine reason by an assinine judge..........

SHEESH.........


8 posted on 09/25/2006 5:08:37 PM PDT by Gabz (Taxaholism, the disease you elect to have (TY xcamel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldironsides
Why would a smoker buy light cigarettes?

Because we prefer the tast...........DUH.

9 posted on 09/25/2006 5:10:00 PM PDT by Gabz (Taxaholism, the disease you elect to have (TY xcamel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

Why? they don't pay the judgement - their customers do.


10 posted on 09/25/2006 5:10:34 PM PDT by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Filthy,filthy lawyers!

Class action suits seem to have devolved into a get rich quick scheme for shyster class.

There will be little or no benefit to the "class". Only the lawyers will be enriched.

11 posted on 09/25/2006 5:24:59 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: okie01

The solution is easy...just stop selling cigarettes in America.

That is their goal..so just DO it.

Inconvenient? Sure! But who cares? It's about "the children".

Let ADULTS buy their cigs from the Indians...tax free! The rest of us can move on. I don't smoke and I don't want your smoke in my face, but I'm tired of these endless lawsuits. Sell them online and shut the rest down.

Oh, but don't you touch my likker!


12 posted on 09/25/2006 5:35:08 PM PDT by sdillard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Wow, when I thought the tobacco industry couldn't be raped anymore than it already has, another lawyer steps in to find another orifice to stick it to...........

I wonder how much the govt. stands to profit from this one?

At this point in time, I would just as soon all the tobacco manufacturers in this country close up shop and call it a day. Let the states who profit from the industry cry the blues and let the other states and feds who pimp the tax trade deal with the ultimate losses in revenues.

There is still an international trade which will always be accessible whether legal or not...........

13 posted on 09/25/2006 5:35:28 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Cure for Islamo-Fascism: Louisville Slugger, apply directly to the forehead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01
"There will be little or no benefit to the "class". Only the lawyers will be enriched."

This "class action" jackpot justice is of the Lawyers, by the Lawyers, and FOR the Lawyers.

In this multi-billion dollar suit, the "plaintiffs" are the signee's who the lawyers chased down to get there first with the Class Action suit (before OTHER lawyers, as it's a drag race to the courthouse every time).

The plaintiffs (the smokers) will wind up with a coupon for a discount on a carton of stop-smoking pills for each of them, while the Lawyers pocket BILLIONS in CASH, again at the expense of Tobacco consumers.

Now, if we can just find some reason for certain spring water to be linked to excessive peeing syndrome, the Limousine Liberals will wake up to the resulting $5.00-a-bottle water AFTER the Billions in that case goes in the Lawyers' pockets.

As they say, it all depends on who's ox is being gored, and the American's who do not smoke and support this jackpot justice do so because it hasn't reached THEIR pockets (YET).

14 posted on 09/25/2006 5:37:21 PM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sdillard
Sell them online and shut the rest down.

Thy've pretty much shut that down already.

Oh, but don't you touch my likker!

Don't worry - that's being done as we post. The major funding organization behind all the anti-smoker propaganda controls MADD...........every Johnson and Johnson product you buy adds money to the control freak nanny-statists that oppsoe smoking, drinking, eating red meat, and the 2nd Amendment.

15 posted on 09/25/2006 5:47:12 PM PDT by Gabz (Taxaholism, the disease you elect to have (TY xcamel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sdillard

Half of me agrees with you and the other half laughs at your apparent head in the sand naivete.

The first half of your post: If they banned tobacco altogether it would be a refreshing breath of subtlety on the anti's part. We'll all just buy it from the original cultivators of the crop...the Native Americans. They will all get rich while the states who are addicted to MSA revenue and their partners the Tobacco companies get poor. That would prove there is a God.

The last half of your post:

Don't touch my likker.

So you think as a non-smoker that you get a "Get Out of Health Totalitarianism Free" card? Is that it?

Oh they will touch your likker and mine too. You see my friend, Fascists typically target a persecuted minority first while other citizens look on and say "Good, I didn't like those people anyway." And smokers rank somewhere between lepers and squeegie pests in your eyes apparantly.

When they come for you the drinkers(as if they havent' already), and the eaters, you'll know how the Jews felt when they saw their former oppressors dragged off to the same concentration camp as them.


16 posted on 09/25/2006 6:00:14 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 ("Government is not the solution to the problem; government is the problem."--Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The "lawyers" will get 4 billion bucks each and all the "smokers" who join the "suit" will get a coupon for four bucks off a carton of Marlboro Lights. Our so-called justice system REALLY sucks.


17 posted on 09/25/2006 6:02:23 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (You can't defeat your enemy unless you are willing to get down in the mud with him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
and all the "smokers" who join the "suit" will get a coupon for four bucks off a carton of Marlboro Lights.

That will be immediately after they raise the price of a carton by $6.00 to cover the cost of the suit.

18 posted on 09/25/2006 6:06:33 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sdillard
And after they ban cigarettes and your likker, they'll come after the food you eat, the car you drive and anything else you enjoy at the expense of "the children."
19 posted on 09/25/2006 6:09:08 PM PDT by HoosierHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

you've got that right!!!!

But you'd be surprised how many people still buy their cigs at the local store. I know I am! And you'd be surprised how many smokers there still are!! I think that there are ALOT of smokers out there who aren't being counted!


20 posted on 09/25/2006 6:11:20 PM PDT by annelizly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson