Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PM says Bush won't allow nuclear Iran
Jerusalem Post ^ | 9/26/6

Posted on 09/25/2006 7:33:44 PM PDT by SmithL

US President George W. Bush will stop the Iranians from getting a nuclear bomb, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert stated with certainty during an interview with The Jerusalem Post on Monday.

Olmert's comments come amid a debate raging in Jerusalem about whether the US will eventually take military action to stop the Iranian march to nuclear capability, whether Israel might have to act on its own, and whether Jerusalem should reconcile itself to a nuclear Iran.

Asked whether he felt that Bush would, one way or another, stop Iran from going nuclear, Olmert replied succinctly, "I believe so."

Olmert said Bush was very determined on this issue. "First of all I think President Bush has the courage," he said during the interview in his Jerusalem office. "This is something that is very important. There is no one in the world today who has greater courage and determination, and a sense of mission about these issues, than President Bush, and I admire his determination and sense of mission."

Olmert's assessment is at odds with those inside the intelligence community who argue that the US president is too over-extended in Iraq and Afghanistan, and too politically weak at home, to take military action against Teheran.

As to whether Israel had a military option of its own regarding Iran, Olmert said, "Israel can't accept the possibility of Iranians having nuclear weapons and we will act together with the international forces, starting with America, in order to prevent it. And as I also said, I believe that President Bush is absolutely determined to prevent it, and America has the capabilities to actually prevent it."

Olmert, in the interview that will be published in its entirety in Friday's edition of the Post, said he did not feel Israel should begin getting used to the notion of living with a nuclear Iran.

"I don't think Israel can be reconciled [to this]," he said. "I don't intend to. This is a danger that is just one thing we can't afford."
Earlier this month, Vice Premier Shimon Peres said that if Iran were to develop a nuclear capability, Israel and the West would develop the means to deal with it. This was the first public indication from a cabinet minister that Jerusalem has been thinking about how to deal with a nuclear-armed Iran.

During the interview, Olmert also waged a spirited defense of the war in Lebanon, saying that even though Israel had no answer to the short-range missiles that rained down on the North, Israel's strategic deterrence was not harmed.

"Everyone understands that this is something that has to be dealt with," Olmert said of the short-range Katyushas and Kassam rocket threats.
"It will be dealt with, we will find a technological answer, and once a technological answer is found we will be done with it. So it is just a matter of time. It is true that in the meantime it is a major nuisance, but it is not a strategic threat to the State of Israel."

He said it was a mistake to focus on the short-range missile threat, and that the IAF's ability to take out the long-range missiles, which it did in the first few hours of the war, was of greater significance "in terms of the degree of threat that the Arabs feel they can impose on Israel."

Regarding the widespread perception in the Arab world that Hizbullah won the war, Olmert said he had "a different perception of what their view is of Israel, based on knowledge from what I read and see."

He said that the perception that Hizbullah emerged with a victory was "one of the most dangerous perceptions," but that it was generated "entirely, completely, wholeheartedly here, not there, only because of political considerations, only because of a total lack of proportion. These perceptions are created here and they are spread from here to the outside."

As to the abducted soldiers, Olmert would not discuss whether he would be willing to release Fatah-Tanzim leader Marwan Barghouti in a deal to free Cpl. Gilad Shalit, but said that Barghouti was not one of the prisoners he had considered releasing before Shalit's abduction.

Olmert also would not say categorically that he would not release Samir Kuntar in a deal involving Ehud Goldwasser and Eldad Regev. Kuntar, the longest-serving confirmed Lebanese prisoner in jail in Israel, is serving multiple life terms for the killing of three members of the Haran family and policeman Eliahu Shahar in a raid on Nahariya in 1979.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: irandelendaest; nukeiran
Iran Delenda Est!
1 posted on 09/25/2006 7:33:45 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I don't think he's going to have much choice, unless the Dems get religion, which is pretty unlikely.


2 posted on 09/25/2006 7:36:52 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Knowing Olmert, all he is doing is trying to set Bush up to blame if Iran gets the nuke. A real statesman wouldn't say anything like this.


3 posted on 09/25/2006 7:37:00 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

If the Democrats win Congress in Nov he will have no choice.


4 posted on 09/25/2006 7:41:35 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Say Leftists. How many Nazis did killing Nazis in WW2 create? or Samurai? or Fascists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

If the Democrats win I wonder if President Bush will order strikes on Iran between the Elections and the New Congress? I mean his predecessor Bill Clinton had no problem bombing the snot out of Iraq in Dec 1998. Right after the 2004 Elections they took out the terrorists in Fallugha Iraq.


5 posted on 09/25/2006 7:44:32 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Say Leftists. How many Nazis did killing Nazis in WW2 create? or Samurai? or Fascists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL; Alouette; All

Hey Alouette what chance of Ohlmet blame Dubya on this


6 posted on 09/25/2006 7:56:22 PM PDT by SevenofNine (I'd rather hunt with Dick Cheney than ride with Ted Kennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: SmithL

I just think he better not let them. Of course, I am so sure Bill Clinton wouldn't aren't you?


8 posted on 09/25/2006 7:58:54 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dixieshaw
dixieshaw Since Sep 26, 2006

So which serial troller are you?

Iran can close the Persian Gulf at any time and Nukes will make it much more costly to make them stop it. They would hold an economic knife to the throat of the West.

A Persian bomb would mean the Gulf Arabs will want a bomb as a counter balance. Thus provoking an Nuke Arms race is the most politically unstable part of the World.

There is just 2 of of the dozes of reasons Iran with the Bomb would be Strategic Military nightmare for the West.

NO one is ever going to ask a "Peace at Any Price" type to die for anything. I seriously doubt you would even don a uniform even if drafted.

Go read about Appeasement and Isolationism. Both are totally failed International Relations Doctrines.

Just because YOU cannot be bothered to worry about US National and Economic Security is no reason any of the rest of us should follow these failed dogmas with you.

9 posted on 09/25/2006 8:06:37 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Say Leftists. How many Nazis did killing Nazis in WW2 create? or Samurai? or Fascists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The Iranians don't have to worry about Bush they just have to wait another 28 months.


10 posted on 09/25/2006 8:08:38 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

"i believe so".

So he is not really sure.

Good.

NO2


11 posted on 09/25/2006 9:49:42 PM PDT by No2much3 (I did not ask for this user name, but I will keep it !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Hopefully, Olmert's government will fall and be replaced by the Likud and Bibi As PM once again.


12 posted on 09/25/2006 9:52:55 PM PDT by onyx (1 Billion Muslims -- IF only 10% are radical, that's still 100 Million who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson