Skip to comments.
Should Presidents Be Allowed To Serve More Than 2 Terms?
World Net Daily ^
| October 8, 2006
| WND
Posted on 10/08/2006 11:22:08 AM PDT by janetgreen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-103 last
To: kinoxi; ImpBill; Clintonfatigued; Torie; Kuksool; JohnnyZ; AuH2ORepublican; AntiGuv
"No."
"HELL NO!!!"
Whaddya know, my first two reactions were these three words in exact order. ;-)
101
posted on
10/08/2006 9:30:57 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
To: ImpBill
That is certainly emphatic Imp. I'd say to Steny, we aren't a democracy, never were, hope never to be, and I'm not for messing with the Constitution. If it was up to me we'd have ten amendments, and that's it. Nevertheless, the founders chose to make the amendment process available.
102
posted on
10/08/2006 10:38:39 PM PDT
by
wita
(truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
To: Bogtrotter52; sheana
"Why not just have Kings (or Queens)......"
Because we already have Hollywood. That is our royalty.
I seems when royalty doesn't exist it gets created.
103
posted on
10/09/2006 11:02:06 AM PDT
by
oyez
( The older I get, the better I was.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-103 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson