Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam; Enchante; jrooney; karnage; BinaryBoy; G.Mason; TexasCajun; edcoil; PeteB570; Ohioan; ...
What would an ethical and good-natured Repatriation Policy be like? There in Belgium, here, wherever. Consentual and non-coercive one would assume -- along the lines of an offer for relocation asssistance and counsel.

About what percent of cultural aliens would accept such an offer of Cultural Repatriation?

14 posted on 10/08/2006 7:04:30 PM PDT by ProCivitas ("Well... it ain't exactly a Swiss village, is it?" --- Colin Quinn, Boston Comic,ToughCrowd host.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ProCivitas; All
What would an ethical and good-natured Repatriation Policy be like?

Well I'm not a professional psychologist, but I've gotten into behavioral psychology lately, because the question "Why do they do that?" fascinates me.

In this case, if one stimulus is agreeable and another disagreeable, then the organism in question will gravitate toward that which is agreeable.

So first and foremost, stop giving these people social benefits, (cash, apartments, food, cars). I mean that alone explains why they want to come to Europe, those things are very agreeable stimuli. Their absence would replace a positive with an empty set.

Then, when that stimulus is removed, pay them some large amount of money( Oh, I don't know, perhaps the dollar amount that all those services are costing society anyway over a 3 or 5 year period, something like that), to move away from Europe and renounce any right for themselves or their children to live there.

To make it even more attractive, the European state in question could build a new city for these people in whatever Muslim hovel they move back to. Yes, just a bunch of row houses and some roads, a few water works, a bit of infrastructure you see. Of course it will all go to ruin when these people move back and continue their time tested habits for generating poverty and violence, but that won't be the problem of the European country anymore at that point.

Of course the decision must be made to cut off the benefits, and to single out Muslims, and those break civil laws across Europe, and are a political argument, but behaviorally, I think this Big Compensation scheme would do the trick. And the payouts would stop (that's cash payouts and the social costs of hosting belligerent Muslim populations) with each removed family, so overtime it pays for itself, and everyone gets something nice and should be happy, but except once the money runs out and the new houses get run down, the Muslims will be back to complaining, but they must change their ways if they want to change the Muslim world in any meaningful way going forward.
33 posted on 10/08/2006 8:18:06 PM PDT by starbase (Understanding Written Propaganda (click "starbase" to learn 22 manipulating tricks!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson