Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SAN FRANCISCO: Anchor's comments anger gays, lesbians
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 10/12/6 | Wyatt Buchanan

Posted on 10/12/2006 8:00:06 AM PDT by SmithL

San Francisco public officials and leaders of the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community are demanding that a prominent radio host and television news anchor apologize for comments he made on the air about nontraditional families.

Pete Wilson, the anchor of ABC's local evening news and host of a radio show on KGO 810 AM, criticized Supervisor Bevan Dufty and his friend Rebecca Goldfader, who are sharing a home and co-parenting a newborn, during a radio broadcast Tuesday.

Their daughter, Sydney, was born last week. Wilson, who said he supports same-sex marriage and lesbian and gay couples raising children, referred to her as an "experiment" because they're not in a romantic relationship.

"The Dufty-Goldfader baby is, in my mind, a travesty," Wilson said during an hour he devoted to the topic on air. "Or a potential travesty. Perhaps that's a better way of saying it."

Later in his show, Wilson said, "At some point there is a limit to how far we stretch the self-indulgent search for the alternative that we have been involved in the last 30 or 40 years in this country."

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; pervertgate; petewilson; playinghouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
For the record, this Pete Wilson is NOT the former Governor. He is a TV news anchor and a radio talk-show host. He is an unabashed liberal with more common sense than most of his contemporaries in San Francisco.
1 posted on 10/12/2006 8:00:06 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Fatwa!


2 posted on 10/12/2006 8:01:18 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Aplogize for what exactly?


3 posted on 10/12/2006 8:03:08 AM PDT by BenLurkin ("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

So they are just a couple of friends deciding, hey lets have a kid. How dare anybody question that. What two consenting adults do for kicks to a nonconsenting child is their business.


4 posted on 10/12/2006 8:05:15 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

For the record, this Pete Wilson is NOT the former Governor



Thank you for clearing that up. Almost stroked out there for a second.


5 posted on 10/12/2006 8:05:33 AM PDT by crazyhorse691 (Diplomacy doesn't work when seagulls rain on your parade. A shotgun and umbrella does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I'm outraged too.  This arrangement should be referred to as an "abomination"

Owl_Eagle

If what I just wrote made you sad or angry,
it was probably just a joke.


6 posted on 10/12/2006 8:05:55 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I'm not sure I understand. These are a gay man and a lesbian woman who are living together platonically and are having a baby together???!!!


7 posted on 10/12/2006 8:06:32 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

If they were two friends wanting to raise a child, why didn't they just adopt? I hope nobody would be against that.


8 posted on 10/12/2006 8:07:01 AM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Aplogize for what exactly?

For having the audacity to question anyone's lifestyle choice. Whatever any two people decide to do can not be quesitioned, it must be praised.

9 posted on 10/12/2006 8:07:08 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
He is an unabashed liberal with more common sense than most of his contemporaries in San Francisco.

That is not saying much. Not much at all.

10 posted on 10/12/2006 8:08:21 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

"San Francisco public officials and leaders of the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community "

That's pretty much the whole damn town isn't it?


11 posted on 10/12/2006 8:08:54 AM PDT by Carl LaFong (Give Turtle Bay back to the turtles.Oh...and watch out for snakes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I'd like an apology from the Gay community of SF for driving families out of the city and having it named the most kid unfriendly big city in the country. Housing prices, notwithstanding.


12 posted on 10/12/2006 8:09:23 AM PDT by sappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

They also angered Muslims, but that is so much a given these days that the story didn't bother to mention it.


13 posted on 10/12/2006 8:09:52 AM PDT by steve-b (It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

The queers in SF at it again.


14 posted on 10/12/2006 8:09:54 AM PDT by jocko12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
If they were two friends wanting to raise a child, why didn't they just adopt? I hope nobody would be against that.

Me and a couple beer buddies decide it would be cool to adopt a kid. We figure he can get our beers from the fridge for us. Yes, I think you can be against adopting kids out to 'parents' who are just friends. There is no committed relationship there. What happens with the lesbian finds here 'true' love and wants to take the kid. Who gets the kid? The kid is basically condemned into being from a broken home from day 1.

15 posted on 10/12/2006 8:11:47 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

So the garbage, bacon, lettuce, tomato and optional sauce group is upset about what? The fact that a gay man had sex with a straight woman?


16 posted on 10/12/2006 8:11:51 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

17 posted on 10/12/2006 8:13:31 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (Say "NO" to the Trans-Texas Corridor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The Gaystapo strikes again.


18 posted on 10/12/2006 8:14:28 AM PDT by Nextrush (Chris Matthews Band: "I get high...... I get high.....I get high.....McCain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle

"abomination"

In Media-speak, the only people who can possibly commit ""abominations" are Republicans...

There WAS a time in America when an arrangement such as this would result in a massive response from Child Protective Services, but since Democrats and Liberals are no longer required or even expected to be moral, how can you be outraged??


19 posted on 10/12/2006 8:15:07 AM PDT by tcrlaf (VOTE DEM! You'll Look GREAT In A Burqa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Gay, lesbian, bisexual oh yeah and the real freaks the transgenders, now that is how I think of San Francisco.


20 posted on 10/12/2006 8:15:51 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson