Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Way too many people for this country. The quality of life will suffer, environment will be damaged, nonrenewable resources will be used up at a greater frequency, and most of the immigrants (by no means all) will push us towards a 3rd World country (many even refuse to learn the language and demand special perks).
10 posted on 10/17/2006 11:37:00 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dante3

So true. The option for on ordinary family to live comfortably on a few acres in an outer suburban or rural area is gradually vanishing. People who keep putting forward silly calculations of how many acres there are in the US and how we could easily fit a hundreds of millions more in, scare me. Not only do these scenarios leave out massive chunks of reality, but they also seem to imply that rapid population growth can go on forever with no harm to quality of life. As if "proving" that the US could hold a billion people all living in nuclear families on one acre plots, means that that would still be true 2 generations later, after the population had quadrupled due to people having an average of 4 children apiece.

I'm not eager to have my grandchildren and great-grandchildren grow up in a country where experiencing time alone with nature, looking out on hundreds of acres of undeveloped, unpopulated land, is no more possible than seeing a flock of passenger pigeons. We're going to have to stop, so we might as well stop now, while there really is enough for everybody. And we need to get the third world to stop too, because they'll just keep swarming over our borders in ever larger numbers as they keep making more and more of themselves.

It never seems to occur to the more-babies-are-always-better crowd that crowding equals socialism. People lose their sense of self and of family unit, as they are constantly surrounded by and superficially interacting with huge numbers of people, including many they don't know at all. They come to believe that everybody's problems are their own, and that their own problems are everybody else's, because the the dividing line between self and others is pressed out of existence.


17 posted on 10/17/2006 1:14:04 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Dante3

If managed properly, the US could hold a billion people. However, that would likely only be possible if the growth was natural and not immigrant-induced. Some immigration should be encouraged (mainly to replace emigrants), but not as a population growth mechanism.


20 posted on 10/17/2006 1:51:31 PM PDT by Heartofsong83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Dante3

The country was originally designed for 500 million. It was a lot quieter when there were 150 million--must be said.


26 posted on 10/17/2006 4:48:03 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Dante3
Are you the one who put overpopulation in the keyword list?

The United States has plenty of space. Assimilation should be worked on, along with natural increase.

30 posted on 10/17/2006 10:46:44 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( Microevolution is real; Macroevolution is not real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Dante3

Sorry. Apparently you have friends in the overpopulation group, all candidates for the keyword.


32 posted on 10/17/2006 10:49:10 PM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( Microevolution is real; Macroevolution is not real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson