Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court Examines Rendell's Role In 1998 Protester Beatings
The Evening Bulletin ^ | 10/20/2006 | WILLIAM MULGREW

Posted on 10/20/2006 10:34:49 AM PDT by Miami Vice

Edited on 10/20/2006 10:45:19 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-122 next last
To: Miami Vice

I met Rendell once. Total creep, and I know creeps.


61 posted on 10/20/2006 7:42:42 PM PDT by PghBaldy (Depose Nancy! What did she know and when did she know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

We hope and pray you are right!


62 posted on 10/20/2006 8:04:14 PM PDT by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

I used to run in to him, several times a week!


63 posted on 10/20/2006 8:05:12 PM PDT by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture

You are correct, CCC. Don has never posted under any screen name (including mine) on this or any other forum. Because of certain events which have occurred due to his involvement with this case, he believes it is best to wait until the matter is finally decided.


64 posted on 10/20/2006 8:10:34 PM PDT by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

Don't we all!!

B T T T


65 posted on 10/20/2006 8:14:19 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Our troops will send all of the worlds terrorists to hell in a handbasket with no virgins!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: dixie sass

Here's an even better update!


66 posted on 10/20/2006 8:26:19 PM PDT by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

Amen.


67 posted on 10/20/2006 8:28:23 PM PDT by fatima (Knock it off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Miami Vice
The article "neglected" to mention that Rendell is a DEMOCRAT. I'm sure that was an unintended oversight...... Also, Gov. Rendell ADMITTED ...."instructing the union to "drown-out" the Clinton protesters."

How does that fit with Gov. Rendell's claim......."I wanted this to be extremely peaceful and extremely positive".

"Drowning out" the Clinton protesters is "peaceful and EXTREMELY positive"?

Bullshit Gov.

Semper Fi

68 posted on 10/20/2006 10:14:23 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: river rat

Keep in mind Rendell's wife is a federal judge in this circuit.


69 posted on 10/20/2006 10:18:34 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Williams
So What?

That doesn't entitle him to conspire with union thugs to deny 1st Amend. rights to protesters..

Nor does it place him above the law or exempt from the consequences of illegal acts..

I hope they fry his ass.....
His wife can do NOTHING to help him - without placing herself in jeopardy....

These bastards can't operate in the shadows anymore...

Semper Fi
70 posted on 10/20/2006 10:27:30 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: hattend
Either Don Adams or his wife were/are FReepers
I'm impressed. I loved "Max" but had no idea of the tie-in.
71 posted on 10/20/2006 11:28:40 PM PDT by Da Mav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: YOUGOTIT

You are a little over the top there.


72 posted on 10/21/2006 3:54:13 AM PDT by exnavy (God bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Physicist

BTTT!


73 posted on 10/21/2006 6:59:10 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: river rat

I don't know why when I post an anti Rendell comment I get yelled at as if I just said something in support. I was pointing out that the judges on that circuit, especially the democrats, are going to be hesitant to decide against one of their own member's family. It's not right and many are fine judges, but that natural prejudice will be there.


74 posted on 10/21/2006 7:02:01 AM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: mainepatsfan

He has behind him the most powerful organization for using extortion, intimidation, violence, and vote-recounting to rig elections: the DNC.


75 posted on 10/21/2006 7:07:50 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HKMk23
>...Morris died in 2001.
"That's nearly the only positive thing to come out of this story, so far. We're at least assured that ol' Morris is gettin' his due."

Getting his due down *there* maybe, yea.

OTOH what do you want to bet Rendell's entire defense will be based upon the fact Morris is *dead*?
The defense will plead since Morris cannot give testimony the case *must* be thrown out & the reason given for the dismissal by the court will be as bizarre as this entire incident taking so long to be adjudicated.

I can envision a court ruling along the lines of, "Since Morris is [now] dead, he is incapable of defending himself."
I kid-you-not.
Just watch the bought & paid for Liberal-Socialist judicial worms pull a stunt like [that].

If a video tape of the assault didn't make this whole thing a 100% slam-dunk in the Adams' favor, at least against the Teamsters?
Then of what gravity will sworn statements incriminating the slimy suckers have?
This is what's on my mind.

"Burn in Hell, ya worthless bastard!"

Aye.

...I'll drink to that. ;^)

76 posted on 10/21/2006 7:42:46 AM PDT by Landru (That does it, no sleep number for you pal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: exnavy; YOUGOTIT
"You are a little over the top there."

And I respectfully disagree.
I feel "YOUGOTIT" sums up the situation quite nicely.
In fact "YOUGOTIT" has it.

OTOH if you know something we don't, X.

...let's have it.

77 posted on 10/21/2006 7:56:14 AM PDT by Landru (That does it, no sleep number for you pal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591
"Don and I were discussing the bulletin article just minutes ago and I am so glad to see it's posted."

I agree, it is good to see *something* reported on this matter as opposed to nothing; which, is precisely what most of us who've been following this c/would've anticipated and/or expected.
So unusual is this it almost makes me a tad *suspicious*.

"We made the same point you did about the Teamsters offer to drop charges against Don, if Don dropped charges against the Teamsters."

Sure and Don & you didn't take the bait, and in hindsight it's a good thing you didn't accept because you'd have tied your own hands as they proceeded to slime you in *their* media.
Neat, huh.
Same "old" union thuggery -- & *adopted* by the Liberal-Socialist Democrats, no less -- modus operandi.

"Don went to the US Justice Department shortly after it happened, which angered Lynn Abraham, who publicly claimed Don had filed a civil suit at that time for "monies" even though no such suit was filed by Don."

Ahhhhh yes, and then there's our *honey* Lynn Abraham & her shenanigans engineered to impede this matter any & every way she possibly could.
She did so from her publicly elected office, too.
We mustn't forget that because she's in for her comeuppance, shall we say a *piece* of whatever shit sandwich comes of this for her role? :o)
Abraham's hands aren't just *dirty*, they're filthy.

So what's the "Twisted Sister of Law" been doing these days, Ter?
Surely she's still not acting as a (Ass't?) DA for Philly, is she?

"After learning much more in the discovery, we asked Judicial Watch to go to the US Justice Department, and we asked them to claim RICO from day one among other things."

Of course the answer was negatory, & we would've expected no less from a Clintigula JD.
But that's changed, the sands of political time have shifted so perhaps that tack's worthy of reconsideration, again?
Timing's *everything* they say?
Just a thought. ;^)

"Yes, we concur that ALL the things you underlined, are good evidence of conspiracy on the part of Mayor Rendell, Teamster Union Boss John Morris and DA Lynn Abraham, along with the fact that Don who took the brunt of it (and I) were physically assaulted for protesting and then removed from the scene eliminating our ability to demonstrate further."

Yup, rarely have I witnessed so much incriminating evidence which doesn't merely *speak* corruption, it shouts it.
When your & Don's time comes, this stuff is a virtual legal MOAB & has the potential of blowing *all* the suspects (named above) to itsy-bitsy *atoms*.

"You make such very valid points, most of which we have have discussed at lengths ourselves. We believe we were of the wrong political party, and the wrong ideology."

Yes, and so much more.

"Also, after the Teamsters filed a private criminal complaint against Don we filed one against John Morris which was never approved, even though he can be seen on the video ramming a fedora on Don so low, it covered his eyes, in that apparent signal to attack."

Not only as a signal to commence an attack, dear Lady.
Almost as important the act was meant to insure Don (& you) could not ID any attacker(s), also.
This Morris, such a slick thug was he.
In my MP days we would've called this worm a, "Latrine House Lawyer".
He thought he knew "law" but in reality knew just enough to screw himself up. ;^)

Also I *should've* pinged you -- of all people -- to #76.
Sorry, Ter.

...my-bad. ;^)

78 posted on 10/21/2006 8:29:47 AM PDT by Landru (That does it, no sleep number for you pal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Miami Vice
Bttt.

5.56mm

79 posted on 10/21/2006 9:09:50 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miami Vice

Thanks for this post. My husband and I are voting for Swann and Santorum, don't try to stop us!

Why do I have a feeling we won't be reading this story in the Philly Enquirer? I must confess I tend to only read their comics, not Boondocks or Doonesbum anyway. Which is why we subscribe annually to The Washington Times, America's Newspaper! And still only $.25--best bargain on the planet! And Crankshaft too.


80 posted on 10/21/2006 10:31:21 AM PDT by GoldwaterChick (Never give in, never give in, never, never, never give in. Winston Churchill, October 29, 1941)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson