More of the usual hiding behind non-commitment.
People don't agree with you about what is reasonable. Are you aware of that?
People don't agree with your cherry picked unenumerated rights. Are you aware of that?
There is a disagreement. Who decides who is right? The People who have every reason to pass reasonable laws, so as to protect themselves, or five appointed men?
Answer the question if you have the guts.
We the people have already decided, -- read the BOR's and the 14th for reasonable restrictions on the police powers of State/local/fed governments.
Answer the question if you have the guts.
If you had any guts, you would admit that you have no rebuttal for the fact I've stated; -- our Constitution and its Amendments place reasonable restrictions on the police powers of State/local/fed governments, and the people elected to pass reasonable laws, so as to protect us all.
Five appointed men? -- The USSC is only empowered to have "-- appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make. --"