To: Mojave
Apparently there is a lack of understanding of what, "I'm not reading your posts" means to some people. Is it still stalking if no one reads it?
486 posted on
11/04/2006 8:32:49 AM PST by
SampleMan
(Do not dispute the peacefulness of Islam, so as not to send Muslims into violent outrage.)
To: SampleMan; everyone
As we see, S-man has ~convinced~ himself that somehow this debate has become a personal insult game, and that any remarks I make about his constitutional misconceptions in effect 'call him a liar'; -- and that this allows him to make personal remarks in return.
I've run across this 'conviction' before with other opponents:
In the next stage, - when I continue to challenge his points [which he has ~chosen~ to ignore], - he will call in the mods & insist on protection from my dissent.
Unable to defend his political misconceptions about prohibitions, S-man is refusing to debate. -- That is not a lie, it is a fact.
487 posted on
11/04/2006 8:49:33 AM PST by
tpaine
To: SampleMan
To whomever it may concern, (that would still be reading posts not them, on an otherwise dormant thread).
If I'm not answering your posts, its because your behavior has led directly to me not reading them. I say again, I AM NOT READING THEM. Likely, no one is reading them. Cease annoying me with your desperate pleas for attention.
488 posted on
11/04/2006 9:22:31 AM PST by
SampleMan
(Do not dispute the peacefulness of Islam, so as not to send Muslims into violent outrage.)
To: SampleMan
If it's any consolation, you're just one of a number of posters being obsessively stalked.
490 posted on
11/04/2006 10:39:26 AM PST by
Mojave
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson