To: tacticalogic; SampleMan
"Best case scenario is that we get legal guns/speech/religion, and the drug question is left up to the States, where it belongs."Why can't the guns/speech/religion decisions be made at the state level also, where the Founding Fathers originally intended they be made?
You're allowing those decisions to be made at the federal level, but not drugs. Why is that?
To: robertpaulsen
You're allowing those decisions to be made at the federal level, but not drugs. Why is that?Public health issues seem to have been intended to be the pervue of the States. Just trying to comply with the original intent.
497 posted on
11/05/2006 6:36:36 AM PST by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: robertpaulsen
Why can't the guns/speech/religion decisions be made at the state level also, where the Founding Fathers originally intended they be made?
You're allowing those decisions to be made at the federal level, but not drugs. Why is that? The Federal government enumerates those rigths, which I believe puts a greater burden on the states in abridging them. Just speaking for myself here.
531 posted on
11/06/2006 11:36:37 AM PST by
SampleMan
(Do not dispute the peacefulness of Islam, so as not to send Muslims into violent outrage.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson