[Turbopilot]

What a rude and irrelevant response to what was, in fact, a direct response to the question you posted (if not the one you meant). I guess I shouldn't have taken you seriously when you asked what I thought was a legitimate question.

Next time, if you want to start a flame war, at least start it with something inflammatory and hostile so that those of us willing to have actual conversations can ignore it, instead of pretending to ask an honest question in a manner indicating you were interested in other perspectives.

[SampleMan]

What a rude and irrelevant response to what was, in fact, a direct response to the question you posted (if not the one you meant).

I said you dodged the question, which you did. You instead went off on a tangent argument that made it clear only by my inference that you are willing to accept any outcome, as long as the WOD is put to an end. Duly noted.

What part of that was irrelevant? And what was rude?

[SampleMan]

Let me clarify my question for you with a specific example. I might not have been clear.

Would a breakdown of the prescription drug system be acceptable? Putting everything over the counter. Antibiotics becoming useless within years and the return of mass death by epidemic as a not uncommon human experience.

Would that be an acceptable outcome as long as the WOD was ended, or is this possibly a concern that has merit?