Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cargill Firing Energizes Lawmakers(Legislators Outraged By Action In Dispute Over Political Sign)
The Daily News Record ^ | 10/28/2006 | Jeff Mellott

Posted on 10/28/2006 1:11:18 PM PDT by High Cotton

HARRISONBURG — Cargill’s firing of a Broadway man in a dispute over a sign he had on his vehicle supporting the proposed marriage amendment has spurred outrage and action by several state legislators.

Sen. Mark Obenshain, R-Harrisonburg, sent a written request to the company’s chief executive officer seeking the reinstatement of Luis Padilla with back pay.

"It would shock me if this reflects a corporate position," Obenshain said on Friday. "If this is the position of the company, I find it outrageous."

Also on Friday, an incensed Del. Bob Marshall, R-Manassas, called for a boycott of Cargill food products because of the company’s action.

(Excerpt) Read more at dnronline.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: election; legislation; marriageamendment; vote

1 posted on 10/28/2006 1:11:21 PM PDT by High Cotton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: High Cotton

If this guy had a bumper sticker supporting gay unions on his vehicle he'd not have been fired.


2 posted on 10/28/2006 1:16:32 PM PDT by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: High Cotton
This Senator--Rep--whatever is demanding a boycott of Cargill so they will change.

When so-called conservative/Christians start boycotting CNN, FOX, ABC, NY +LA Slimes--UNTIL THEY ACTUALLY REPORT ACTUAL NEWS--then these creeps will come around to our side.

3 posted on 10/28/2006 1:16:42 PM PDT by 100-Fold_Return (Vote Early...Vote Often!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: High Cotton

I would think they would have a legal right to fire him, however, if they don't like his views.

The alternative would be legally requiring a contract that should be voluntary on both sides. It would involve more lawsuits, and further government intervention into private enterprise.


4 posted on 10/28/2006 1:17:55 PM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: High Cotton
This was on his personal vehicle; it is none of the company's business even if the vehicle is in the employee parking lot. The only way they have any right to discipline someone for something on their personal vehicle is if it is against the company (ie. don't buy XXX products).

Ok, one other possibility where he should be disciplined; if his vehicle stated "I work for XXX" - and had a political statement.
6 posted on 10/28/2006 2:08:59 PM PDT by logic101.net (Support OUR troops, NOT their's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EllenZ

The whole story has been posted several times on FR. He was told to remove the sign and he did. He then re-placed it and parked in an area he believed to be off of company property. He was then fired for exercising his constitutional right to support a ballot measure.
He has since been rehired.


7 posted on 10/28/2006 2:24:59 PM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson