Skip to comments.
BREAKING: CA Prop 83 (Jessicas Law) Stayed
Roger Hedgecock Show (Live) ^
| Nov 8, 2006
| Phil Thalheimer
Posted on 11/08/2006 4:04:08 PM PST by newzjunkey
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Outrageous!
To: newzjunkey
2
posted on
11/08/2006 4:05:25 PM PST
by
newzjunkey
(Osama is smiling today.)
To: newzjunkey
Can't let people vote and actually decide how society should conduct itself.
That would be "unconstitutional".
3
posted on
11/08/2006 4:05:37 PM PST
by
glorgau
To: newzjunkey
Great, I needed some more good news! What the heck is going on with this country?
4
posted on
11/08/2006 4:06:22 PM PST
by
kcrackel
(Let's make the Democrats the Miniority Party Forever!)
To: newzjunkey
You have got to be kidding me....
5
posted on
11/08/2006 4:06:27 PM PST
by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: calcowgirl; NormsRevenge; FairOpinion
{ {{ PING Jessica's Law HALTED }} }
6
posted on
11/08/2006 4:07:57 PM PST
by
newzjunkey
(Osama is smiling today.)
To: All
Judge Illston is a CLINTON APPOINTEE.
7
posted on
11/08/2006 4:08:54 PM PST
by
newzjunkey
(Osama is smiling today.)
To: newzjunkey
Lawsuit brought in SF by a "John Doe" sex offender claiming the law is retroactive. Just like gun registration laws which are retroactive to prior purchases.
To: newzjunkey
O'Reilly is going to throw a fit.
To: ElkGroveDan
this country is going down hill in a hurry
To: newzjunkey
85 lost by a wider margin than last year. It would seem I might as well have stayed home last night. 85, 90, Mountjoy, McClintock, Poochigian, Strickland... this state is a mess.
11
posted on
11/08/2006 4:12:22 PM PST
by
Tim Long
(Don't blame me. I voted conservative.)
To: newzjunkey
Results: Prop 83, Sex Offender Reform
4,642,616 (70.5%) YES, 1,943,779 (29.5%) NO.
12
posted on
11/08/2006 4:13:06 PM PST
by
newzjunkey
(Osama is smiling today.)
To: newzjunkey
California judges are a huge problem. You could fire every single one of them and still have to put up with the damage they'd done for the next two or three decades, if not longer.
I voted down every Davis and Schwarzenegger appointed judge this go-round. I'll do it next time as well.
13
posted on
11/08/2006 4:13:58 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
To: newzjunkey
14
posted on
11/08/2006 4:14:42 PM PST
by
catpuppy
To: newzjunkey
If a person committed a crime before the sex-registry law was put in place, that person should be exempt from it. Likewise, if someone plea-bargains to a misdemeanor domestic-violence charge before a statute was passed forbidding gun ownership to domestic-violents misdemeanants, that person should be exempt from that statute.
While I'll admit that a number of Supreme Court judges care more about what they want in each case, than about any sort of consistency, a case such as this one should be a basis for re-challenging the Lautenberg Abomination.
15
posted on
11/08/2006 4:19:54 PM PST
by
supercat
(Sony delenda est.)
To: newzjunkey
" ... SF, Alameda, Marin and Sonoma. ..."
Funny, the highest profile sex-offender pedophile cases recently have been in precisely these same counties, plus Orange. Except that in Orange, they give them the death penalty.
16
posted on
11/08/2006 4:26:45 PM PST
by
Rte66
To: ElkGroveDan; newzjunkey
There were a lot of vague provisions in this law. Doesn't surprise me that it's already in the courts. Certain things need to be defined or this thing will be an absolute mess. That's not to say that this case is moving to litigate the right issues. My guess is there will be more cases and more John Does before it's all over as there were plenty of issues.
17
posted on
11/08/2006 4:27:34 PM PST
by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
To: newzjunkey
18
posted on
11/08/2006 4:29:28 PM PST
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: edcoil
The suit was typed up well before the votes were cast. You expect anything else?
To: calcowgirl
My guess is there will be more cases and more John Does before it's all over as there were plenty of issues. Does the Cali SC have power to line-item edit a proposition? If not, then if one issue runs afoul of it then it's dead, Jim.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson