Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: CA Prop 83 (Jessicas Law) Stayed
Roger Hedgecock Show (Live) ^ | Nov 8, 2006 | Phil Thalheimer

Posted on 11/08/2006 4:04:08 PM PST by newzjunkey

Breaking now on Roger's radio show in San Diego, Federal Judge Susan Illston has issued a temporary restraining order against Jessica's Law, Prop 83.

Lawsuit brought in SF by a "John Doe" sex offender claiming the law is retroactive.

The order applies in SF, Alameda, Marin and Sonoma. A hearing will be held on Nov 27.

The plaintiff's lawyer is Dennis Riordan.


TOPICS: US: California; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: calinitiatives; dennisriordan; jessicaslaw; judgeshopping; judicialtyranny; prop83; sexoffenders; susanillston
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Outrageous!
1 posted on 11/08/2006 4:04:10 PM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
SF Chronicle has coverage.
2 posted on 11/08/2006 4:05:25 PM PST by newzjunkey (Osama is smiling today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Can't let people vote and actually decide how society should conduct itself.

That would be "unconstitutional".


3 posted on 11/08/2006 4:05:37 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Great, I needed some more good news! What the heck is going on with this country?


4 posted on 11/08/2006 4:06:22 PM PST by kcrackel (Let's make the Democrats the Miniority Party Forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
You have got to be kidding me....


5 posted on 11/08/2006 4:06:27 PM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl; NormsRevenge; FairOpinion

{ {{ PING Jessica's Law HALTED }} }


6 posted on 11/08/2006 4:07:57 PM PST by newzjunkey (Osama is smiling today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Judge Illston is a CLINTON APPOINTEE.


7 posted on 11/08/2006 4:08:54 PM PST by newzjunkey (Osama is smiling today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
Lawsuit brought in SF by a "John Doe" sex offender claiming the law is retroactive.

Just like gun registration laws which are retroactive to prior purchases.

8 posted on 11/08/2006 4:09:52 PM PST by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

O'Reilly is going to throw a fit.


9 posted on 11/08/2006 4:09:57 PM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

this country is going down hill in a hurry


10 posted on 11/08/2006 4:11:04 PM PST by se_ohio_young_conservative (he)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

85 lost by a wider margin than last year. It would seem I might as well have stayed home last night. 85, 90, Mountjoy, McClintock, Poochigian, Strickland... this state is a mess.


11 posted on 11/08/2006 4:12:22 PM PST by Tim Long (Don't blame me. I voted conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
Results: Prop 83, Sex Offender Reform

4,642,616 (70.5%) YES, 	1,943,779 (29.5%) NO.


12 posted on 11/08/2006 4:13:06 PM PST by newzjunkey (Osama is smiling today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

California judges are a huge problem. You could fire every single one of them and still have to put up with the damage they'd done for the next two or three decades, if not longer.

I voted down every Davis and Schwarzenegger appointed judge this go-round. I'll do it next time as well.


13 posted on 11/08/2006 4:13:58 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Figures.


14 posted on 11/08/2006 4:14:42 PM PST by catpuppy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
If a person committed a crime before the sex-registry law was put in place, that person should be exempt from it. Likewise, if someone plea-bargains to a misdemeanor domestic-violence charge before a statute was passed forbidding gun ownership to domestic-violents misdemeanants, that person should be exempt from that statute.

While I'll admit that a number of Supreme Court judges care more about what they want in each case, than about any sort of consistency, a case such as this one should be a basis for re-challenging the Lautenberg Abomination.

15 posted on 11/08/2006 4:19:54 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

" ... SF, Alameda, Marin and Sonoma. ..."

Funny, the highest profile sex-offender pedophile cases recently have been in precisely these same counties, plus Orange. Except that in Orange, they give them the death penalty.


16 posted on 11/08/2006 4:26:45 PM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan; newzjunkey

There were a lot of vague provisions in this law. Doesn't surprise me that it's already in the courts. Certain things need to be defined or this thing will be an absolute mess. That's not to say that this case is moving to litigate the right issues. My guess is there will be more cases and more John Does before it's all over as there were plenty of issues.


17 posted on 11/08/2006 4:27:34 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Sure did not take long.


18 posted on 11/08/2006 4:29:28 PM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

The suit was typed up well before the votes were cast. You expect anything else?


19 posted on 11/08/2006 4:30:25 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
My guess is there will be more cases and more John Does before it's all over as there were plenty of issues.

Does the Cali SC have power to line-item edit a proposition? If not, then if one issue runs afoul of it then it's dead, Jim.

20 posted on 11/08/2006 4:34:20 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson