Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Outrage at London Sting by US Spies
DailyMail ^ | 11th November 2006 | By CHRISTOPHER LEAKE

Posted on 11/11/2006 9:27:39 PM PST by fight_truth_decay

Undercover American agents are staging secret 'sting' operations in Britain against criminal and terrorist suspects they want to extradite to the US.

[• Comment: Beware: George Bush's secret agents can now arrrest us in our own country]

In a recent operation, agents from America's Department of Homeland Security set up a suspect by posing as dealers wanting to illegally sell night-vision goggles for export to Iran.

The spies arranged a series of clandestine meetings in London hotels, which they secretly filmed as evidence. It is thought to be the first time American agents have been caught using such sting tactics in Britain.

Urgent questions were being asked about whether the British Government had been aware of the operation. If so, it raises issues of the State collaborating with foreign agencies to entrap suspects - and if not it raises the spectre of American spies working unchecked on British soil.

Human rights campaigners demanded an explanation from Home Secretary John Reid and Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett.

The case has provoked a huge row because the agents used tactics banned in Britain. In addition, the offence of which he is accused would not be a crime in this country. If British police officers had employed this type of sting, the ensuing case would almost certainly be thrown out of court.

In July 2003, ten defendants accused of laundering £15million walked free from Southwark Crown Court after Judge George Bathurst-Norman described police actions as 'massively illegal'. The judge said a police sting aimed at trapping them had 'overstepped the line between legitimate crime detection and unacceptable crime creation'.

Following the US spy sting an Iranian-born businessman - named by Whitehall officials last night as former Iranian ambassador to Jordan Nosratollah Tajik - now faces extradition to America.

Mr Tajik, who has lived with his family in Britain for several years, is accused of conspiring to sell military equipment to Islamic extremists. He was arrested on the Americans' behalf by British police officers before the alleged deal went ahead and detained in prison for a week.

The sting operation also raises new questions about Britain's one-sided extradition arrangements with the United States, under which British citizens can be sent across the Atlantic for trial with ease.

It is much harder for British authorities to extradite American citizens to the UK.

During the operation, the undercover American agents, who were unarmed, claimed they wanted to sell night-vision goggles, said to be worth £50,000, for export to Iran, in breach of US export controls.

Mr Tajik, who is 52 and was recently in hospital with a serious illness, has since been released on substantial bail and has reported daily to a police station near his Durham home. He is an honorary fellow of Durham University's Institute for Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies and has an engineering degree from the University of Westminster.

Mr Tajik is now due to appear at an extradition hearing at City of Westminster magistrates court on December 4.

The Mail on Sunday understands Mr Tajik's legal team will claim he has no terrorist connections or criminal record and that the American agents acted illegally as 'agents provocateurs' by trapping him.

Sources close to Mr Tajik say he feels he is being made a scapegoat for America's opposition to Iran, and the case could widen the rift between America and Iran because of Mr Tajik's former diplomatic role.

According to a witness at a House of Representatives inquiry into state-sponsored terrorism in Iran in February last year, Mr Tajik was one of several Iranian diplomats recruiting Palestinians to establish terrorist cells.

Matthew Levitt, director of terrorism studies at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said: "Iran actively recruits Palestinians for terrorist training in its camps."

He added: "Iran arranged for free travel, medical treatment and terrorist training for Palestinians who had been wounded in the violence in the Middle East who then returned to the Palestinian territories to establish terrorist cells. Among those involved in the recruitment drive were...Iranian ambassador to Jordan Nosratollah Tajik."

Iran, along with Syria, is also the main sponsor of Hezbollah.

It is not known whether the sting operation is connected to a British investigation launched in August after Israel accused Britain of indirectly supplying Hezbollah terrorists with military night-vision equipment that helped them target Israeli soldiers in Lebanon.

The batch of 250 systems, each stamped "Made in Britain', was discovered by Israeli troops in Hezbollah command bunkers in southern Lebanon. Israel demanded to know whether the night-vision gear was part of a batch sold by Britain to Iran in 2003 for use against drug smugglers.

The sting comes just days after it was revealed that Home Office Ministers signed away crucial British extradition rights with America without holding a single meeting with their US counterparts. The Government last month defeated attempts to block further 'fast-track' extraditions despite a rebellion by backbench Labour MPs.

Critics of the 2003 treaty claim that the burden of proof now required makes it too easy for US authorities to demand that British subjects stand trial in America, as demonstrated by the recent case of the NatWest Three.

British bankers Gary Mulgrew, David Bermingham and Giles Derby fought a long-running but unsuccessful battle to avoid extradition on fraud charges related to the collapse of energy giant Enron. They were extradited in July, and were not allowed to return to the UK despite being granted bail. Their trial will be held in Houston, Texas, next year.

Shami Chakrabarti, director of the human rights group Liberty, said last night: "We already have a one-sided extradition arrangement that allows people to be bundled off to America without so much as a by-your-leave. Now we have US agents operating in Britain entrapping people into criminality in the first place.

"The Home Secretary and the Foreign Secretary must tell us the nature of these agents' operations in Britain."

Liberal Democrat Home Affairs spokesman Nick Clegg said last night: "The case of rendition flights to transport American prisoners for interrogation in other countries raised concerns about the degree to which the American security services run operations on British soil without the full knowledge of the British Government.

"Everyone wants the British and American security services to co-operate well, but we don't want a situation in which American authorities can act on British soil with complete impunity and without regard for British domestic law."

The Metropolitan Police refused to comment on the case. A spokesman said: "We do not discuss our investigative techniques, but we do nothing that is illegal and we work to Home Office guidelines."

A Home Office spokeswoman said: "We are aware that this man is wanted by the US Government on charges of alleged arms sales. The matter is before the courts, so we cannot comment."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: extraditions; iran; nightvisiongear; nosratollah; spysting; tajik; uk; wot
In September of 1995 under Clinton, U.S. agents helped snatch Talaat Fouad Qassem, one of Egypt’s most wanted terrorists, in Croatia. Qassem, having been sentenced to death in absentia, fled to Europe after he was linked by Egyptians to the assassination of Sadat. He was never heard from again.

Hassan Mustafa Osama Nasr, a terrorism suspect who was grabbed off a Milan street in 2003 by spies from the US and Italy, have prosecutors issuing arrest warrants against 26 Americans and suspect Italy Sismi chief Nicolo Pollari, helped in the kidnapping. Nasr claims torture. If a judge authorizes a trial, it would be the first criminal prosecution anywhere in the world for "renditions," and could be just what some Bush and Rumsfeld Haters wish for with their endless rants that the leaders be tried as a war criminals.

1 posted on 11/11/2006 9:27:41 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

DailyMail ^ | 11th November 2006 | By CHRISTOPHER LEAK


2 posted on 11/11/2006 9:32:52 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

So I scratched a letter. Sue me. lol


3 posted on 11/11/2006 9:33:34 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Beware: George Bush's secret agents can now arrrest us in our own country

*eyeroll* It depends on what your definition of "us" is. I can guarantee that the people being targeted DO NOT consider themselves Britons; anyone who believes that they do is mentally ill.

4 posted on 11/11/2006 9:38:25 PM PST by denydenydeny ("We have always been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be detested in France"--Wellington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

Just put a .38 shot in his head. End of problem. The more dead Muslims, the better.


5 posted on 11/11/2006 9:38:41 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

Not to worry. Pelosi and company will put an end to this.


6 posted on 11/11/2006 9:47:08 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (This tagline has been suspended or banned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny; MadIvan
*eyeroll* It depends on what your definition of "us" is. I can guarantee that the people being targeted DO NOT consider themselves Britons; anyone who believes that they do is mentally ill.

The people who are "outraged" don't consider themselves Britons either. The consider themselves 'citizens of the world'.

7 posted on 11/11/2006 9:49:25 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
Just put a .38 shot in his head. End of problem. The more dead Muslims, the better.

Agreed.


8 posted on 11/11/2006 9:54:27 PM PST by Cobra64 (Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

btt


9 posted on 11/11/2006 9:55:26 PM PST by Ciexyz (Satisfied owner of a 2007 Toyota Corolla.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay; USF; Fred Nerks
The case has provoked a huge row because the agents used tactics banned in Britain. In addition, the offense of which he is accused would not be a crime in this country. If British police officers had employed this type of sting, the ensuing case would almost certainly be thrown out of court.

Not to worry...it won't be long before it will be a crime to do this, or any other tactic, to defend this Country here in the U.S.!

10 posted on 11/11/2006 10:03:00 PM PST by jan in Colorado (The ENEMEDIA...aiding and abetting the terrorists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jan in Colorado

I get the feeling this operation is done in cahoots with the British police and/or military and/or intelligence, based on the quotes here.

If that were *not* the case, and we were operating with impunity in our staunchest ally without their okay, I would be outraged.


11 posted on 11/11/2006 10:09:58 PM PST by SueDonim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SueDonim

I concur. The surveilance laws in England aren't nearly as strict as they are in the United States.


12 posted on 11/11/2006 10:48:36 PM PST by xc1427 (It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees...Midnight Oil (Power and the Passion))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SueDonim; Just A Nobody
I get the feeling this operation is done in cahoots with the British police and/or military and/or intelligence

I agree, although they may not be free to admit it.

Things are almost NEVER what they seem (or reported) and the ENEMEDIA will always go out of its way to make our President, the troops, our military etc. look as bad and incompetent as possible!

13 posted on 11/11/2006 10:54:29 PM PST by jan in Colorado (The ENEMEDIA...aiding and abetting the terrorists!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine
"In July 2003, ten defendants accused of laundering £15million walked free from Southwark Crown Court after Judge George Bathurst-Norman described police actions as 'massively illegal'. The judge said a police sting aimed at trapping them had 'overstepped the line between legitimate crime detection and unacceptable crime creation'."

Ridiculous! If only they had..


14 posted on 11/11/2006 10:58:49 PM PST by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
The Daily Mail is one of Rupert Murdoch's tabloid rags. As such, it is prone to manufacturing news in order to sell copies in order to increase ad revenue.

Having lived in London for six years and having known hundreds of Brits, I suspect the vast majority of the citizenry are cheering for the Yanks for doing something that needed to be done which their own government couldn't accomplish.

15 posted on 11/12/2006 1:12:34 AM PST by Zakeet (Be thankful we don't get all the government we pay for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

"George Bush's secret agents can now arrrest us in our own country"

Don't feel bad - the Mexican Army makes regular incursions into the United States.


16 posted on 11/12/2006 3:59:06 AM PST by RoadTest ( He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches. -Rev. 3:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson