Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reason Magazine Blogger Finds Pleasure in Tears of Rick Santorum's 8-year-old Daughter
Right Reason philosophical conservatism. ^ | 11/11/2006 | Francis J. Beckwith

Posted on 11/12/2006 10:48:17 AM PST by Matchett-PI

Reason Magazine Blogger Finds Pleasure in Tears of Rick Santorum's 8-year-old Daughter

Because the libertarian universe has no place for the vulnerable, weak, or the dependent--since none are autonomous adult-choosers in search of virtual kiddie porn--it has no qualms in providing a forum in which children and their families can be verbally abused and have profanities hurled at them. Read and weep Julian Sanchez's "Your Tears Are So Yummy and Sweet" in which the writer says he finds joy in the tears of Rick Santorum's eight-year-old daughter, who is pictured crying next to her father as he gives his concession speech on Tuesday night, November 7. Most of the comments that follow celebrate and contribute to Mr. Sanchez's meanness. In fact, one commentator, named Jon H., makes sarcastic reference to the Santorums' newborn child who died in 1996. ~ Posted by Francis J. Beckwith at 11:25 PM

Your Tears Are So Yummy and Sweet

Julian Sanchez | November 8, 2006, 2:44pm

Man, I haven't taken this much pleasure in the suffering of a small child in days.

Click link to read other like-minded comments.



TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 2006election; asshat; beckworth; dickhead; dirtysanchez; gop; jackass; libertarianfreaks; losertarians; pukeheads; reasonblows; sanchez; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-287 next last
To: EDINVA

Especially since homosexuals are so 'tolerant' of others. /sarcasm


221 posted on 11/12/2006 5:31:50 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: olde north church

Sanchez claims that any problems with polygamy or polyamory would be grounds for banning those practices. Yet I showed in "The Coming Battle," and have shown repeatedly, that the rights-based grounds on which we are being given gay marriage will not be able to exclude polygamy or polyamory.

Sanchez chastises me for my "breathtaking stupidity," my "heroic inanity," my being "brain dead," etc., but his litany of insults does little to disguise the superficiality of his argument. Sanchez admits that he doesn't know what to do with my claim that the analogy between civil rights and gay marriage is flawed. The point of my earlier writings on gay marriage (of which Sanchez appears to be ignorant) is that skin color has no effect on the functioning of marriage as an institution, but that sexual orientation will. Sanchez needs to address the arguments I make in my Commentary article, "What Is Wrong With Gay Marriage," in the gay-marriage debate, and in pieces like "Gay in Hollywood." But of course, he does not. Sanchez also seems to be unfamiliar with the well-established idea that the state's "compelling interest" in marriage, and in the children marriage produces, entitles it to abandon strict neutrality in structuring this institution.


http://tinyurl.com/y82ob2


Stanley Kurtz is a research fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University.


222 posted on 11/12/2006 5:40:16 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

this writer is a kid, very immature and extraordinarily vicious. sure doesn't reflect well on Reason or Cato.


223 posted on 11/12/2006 5:50:41 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

This "man" is just pitiful!! Disgusting!!


224 posted on 11/12/2006 7:13:37 PM PST by Nancee (Nancee Lynn Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Your party became dangerous to Americans on 9/11.

No, the GOP became dangerous to Americans a long time before 9/11, but I fear that like many I have held my nose and said, "the good outweighs the bad"...and as such, I am admitting that I might have been part of the problem in allowing the GOP to become more a party of big government and spending and government intrusion and all the things conservatism is against.

Perhaps it started when GHWB was nominated for Reagan's VP. But the thing to watch is to see whether the GOP's recent strategy of "talk conservative and act liberal" will be changed after this election--perhaps conservatives no longer will put up with the deceit.

225 posted on 11/12/2006 7:14:45 PM PST by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

Not defending whatever was said, but the picture did strike me as odd, in that she seems a bit old to still be playing with a doll.


226 posted on 11/12/2006 7:18:40 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat (Pence for MinL; Giuliani-Watts, Giuliani-Sanford, Giuliani-Pawlenty, or Giuliani-Perdue in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
"...perhaps conservatives no longer will put up with the deceit."

But please explain to me how a conservative's conservative like Rick Santorum, went down to such a resounding defeat? As far I know, Rick stuck to the Repubican and conservative values on every level. And George Soros poured millions of dollars into Pennsylvania and the media routinely blasted this good man, etc. ad nauseum...Doesn't it matter any more if one is principled, faithful, true to his word, etc.?

If it doesn't, then I want to know how we can turn that around? We simply cannot afford to lose men like Rick Santorum and George Allen. These men are not at all in the mold of Arlen Specter who has repeatedly violated the trust of Republican voters in this state throughout his entire tenure. When James Clymer ran against Specter in 2004, I really thought he could have beaten him and sure wish he had.

I would really appreciate some positive direction as to how to turn this mess around. I want to and will make every effort to individually register and educate new voters. I am willing to nurture each voter. Where should I concentrate my energies? I am open to any and all constructive suggestions/ideas; honest I am.

Thank you!!

Nancee

227 posted on 11/12/2006 8:50:39 PM PST by Nancee (Nancee Lynn Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat

Age eight is prime doll-playing years. I played with dolls till I was 12. After that, I would not touch them. When I was eight, I really loved them. Perfectly natural.

I wonder if the angle of the photo makes her look bigger than she is, she is only eight and that's very young.


228 posted on 11/12/2006 9:06:25 PM PST by Kitten Festival
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

BUMP!!!


229 posted on 11/12/2006 10:09:59 PM PST by Nancee (Nancee Lynn Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

When libertarians stop supporting abortion on demand, I will be willing to entertain evidence that they have compassion for kids.


230 posted on 11/12/2006 11:30:31 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Welcome swingers! Pull up a groove and get fabulous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Unknown Pundit

When liberatarians cease supporting abortion on demand I will entertain evidence that they care about the welfare of kids.


231 posted on 11/12/2006 11:32:59 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Welcome swingers! Pull up a groove and get fabulous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cryptical
,I>That's just funny, I don't care who you are that's just funny. (Hey, since he brought them on stage for sympathy they're fair game).

The door to DU is on your left. Don't let it hit you on the ass on your way out; I hate it when people get ass prints on the door.

232 posted on 11/12/2006 11:35:29 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Welcome swingers! Pull up a groove and get fabulous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
I so love that the libertarians think they delivered this election. They're just like the religious conservative activists who thought they delivered the 2004 election for Dubya and should get a bunch of favors.

Hey losertarians, if you can throw a national party out of office, why did we have to suffer through 40 years of Dems running the House?

233 posted on 11/12/2006 11:39:40 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Welcome swingers! Pull up a groove and get fabulous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Zevonismymuse
You don't get to have it both ways by parading them around to get family values votes,

So when San Fran Nan brings her kids to rallies she's trolling for family values votes? Get a grip.

234 posted on 11/12/2006 11:40:58 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Welcome swingers! Pull up a groove and get fabulous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Unknown Pundit

Aren't you a great moral philosopher, excusing bad behavior by citing other bad behavior.


235 posted on 11/12/2006 11:45:46 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Welcome swingers! Pull up a groove and get fabulous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Funny...he hasn't answered your question...:-)


236 posted on 11/12/2006 11:51:26 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Welcome swingers! Pull up a groove and get fabulous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

Surely you have lost your bloody mind to tie this girl to some sort of power grab. The libertines show their true colors again.


237 posted on 11/12/2006 11:54:27 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Welcome swingers! Pull up a groove and get fabulous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: cryptical
If they still make you melt like that, you ought to get on the registry or something... Just sayin.

Sounds like child molestation is right at the top of your mind or something...just sayin.

238 posted on 11/12/2006 11:59:26 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Welcome swingers! Pull up a groove and get fabulous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
One does tend to wonder about a grown adult complaining that a religious or political figure in another state is preventing him from engaging in sexual misbehavior.

I've always loved the line libertines put out about how conservatives are "in our bedrooms." I just wonder, when was the last time any of them decided not to engage in a particular kind of sex because they were afraid they'd get arrested? Probably never.

239 posted on 11/13/2006 12:02:49 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (Welcome swingers! Pull up a groove and get fabulous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Unknown Pundit
He took big time heat for that one, said it was an accident.

He also apologized to Hillary, in person.

240 posted on 11/13/2006 12:03:58 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (Welcome swingers! Pull up a groove and get fabulous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-287 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson