Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spower
Maybe the anti-skid system malfunctioned??

You may have nailed it. From the progression of photos it appears that both mains blew. That says to me that the pilot stomped on the brakes and expected the antilock to keep from flatspotting the tires.

Here's the first pic in the series, and already you can see both rims are on the runway.


15 posted on 11/21/2006 1:47:08 PM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo

Not necessarily a failure. The way most anti-lock brake systems work, if the pilot got the wheels completely locked BEFORE touchdown, they would stay locked on landing, unless the pilot released the brakes and re-grabbed them.


19 posted on 11/21/2006 1:53:20 PM PST by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo

If he stomped the brakes, the airplane would be noticeably nose-down, eh? And why didn't the nose gear tires flatten as well. By my view, not too much weight on the front tire at all.

Doesn't look like the rear struts are fully compressed, so it doesn't appear to be a particularly hard landing.

BE nice to know what really happened here.


20 posted on 11/21/2006 1:54:03 PM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo

Lemmee take that back. The rears are really compressed. I'll vote for hard landing that blew the rears.


21 posted on 11/21/2006 1:55:18 PM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson