Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sine_nomine

I was 36 when I got pregnant and the doctor insisted that I get this test, even though I told her that I was having the baby even if it had any abnormal results. I got mad at the doctor and she finally confided that the state will not pay for the care of a child that the parent refuses to abort if they test positive. I have no idea if that is true or not, but I still insisted that I would never kill my child, no matter what. He is perfectly normal today.

I have also know several friends who tested positive for Down babies, that turned out just fine.


19 posted on 11/26/2006 1:10:27 AM PST by TheresaKett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: TheresaKett

Same thing happened to my cousin. She was told her baby had multiple abnormalities and would not survive for more than a few hours after birth. She refused an abortion and went on to have a perfectly healthy, normal child. Her son is in college today and doing well.

I was 35 when I had my last child. I refused testing. Amniocentesis has a 1% miscarriage rate under the best of circumstances, and I would never abort my child anyway. My daughter is healthy and beautiful. Sometimes what doctors don't know but think they do is frightening.


23 posted on 11/26/2006 6:14:11 AM PST by LadyNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: TheresaKett

That sounds like a crock to me. Federal guidelines about disabled children do not have a clause like that. How could they?


24 posted on 11/26/2006 6:40:07 AM PST by sine_nomine (No more RINO presidents. We need another Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson