To: Pilsner
And who were the Stuarts, but the heirs of the Tudors, who were but the last of a series of Lancastrian usurpers? Unless they have all died out, there is a Yorkist somewhere with a much older claim to the throne of England.
---
They're talking about Scotland, where the Stuarts were the heirs of the Bruces.
66 posted on
11/27/2006 1:52:55 PM PST by
Cheburashka
(World's only Spatula City certified spatula repair and maintenance specialist!!!)
To: Cheburashka
They're talking about Scotland, where the Stuarts were the heirs of the Bruces. Umm. So they were. And the Kings of the Scots got that title by conquest, so the heirs of Kings of Strathclyde, and the other Brittonic Kingdoms, need not start drafting their coronation speeches.
67 posted on
11/27/2006 2:17:20 PM PST by
Pilsner
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson