Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

3-Star General Mike DeLong says intel shows Saddam moved WMD just before invasion
Inside CentCom ^ | 11-28-06 | Bill Thompson

Posted on 11/28/2006 7:11:13 PM PST by ikez78

Mike DeLong Inside CentCom

If you want the inside story of what was being said and done at the top levels of U.S. government from the September 11th attacks until the fall of Saddam Hussein, you can ask one of two men -- Army General Tommy Franks, or Marine Corps General Mike DeLong, who was Franks' deputy.

Listen to Mike DeLong at link....

(Excerpt) Read more at eyeonbooks.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: frwn; iraq; iraqiwmds; iraqwmd; prewardocs; saddamwmd; terrorism; wmd; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: onedoug

OK, what's a pan islamist.


81 posted on 11/29/2006 3:27:37 AM PST by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Whenever you have to pay for the info ,forget about it


82 posted on 11/29/2006 3:29:55 AM PST by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

This administration is a Public Relations DISASTER.

How many of us could have been creative in making the case:

For invasion without WMD?

That WMD WERE found everywhere, including sarin-tipped missiles, mustard gas, etc?

That Saddam attempted to hide military assets in the vast deserts of Iraq, including entire MIG fighter jets, etc?

That WMD were moved to Syria with Russia's fingerprints all over?

That collateral deaths of Iraqi civilians were the direct consequence of harboring terrorists, and if you don't want to die by American bomb, you don't associate with terrorists.

That the United Nations is corrupt from the head down, and has no moral authority to intervene in America's defense.

That Hans Blix and co. are Socialists on a mission, whose credibilty needed to be destroyed.

That the NYTimes needed to be prosecuted for treason.

That the Geneva Convention guided rules of warfare for signatories ONLY, and that since terrorists did not abide by it, America would NOT unilaterally adhere to it.

That detainees in Gitmo would not be given Korans by unclean Americans wearing gloves (WTF??????).

That documents found (think jveritas) implicated Saddam conclusively in much of the above?

Instead, the RINO administration was cowardly, inconsistent and incoherent.

The White House rolled over, installed a buffoon as spokesman, made nice with Pootie-Poot, backslapped Kennedy et. al. and advanced a Socialist domestic agenda, invited Clinton into the family and gave him a platform to rebuilld his legacy in the eyes of the world, chastized Israel for defending itself against terrorism, fought a politically-correct limited war in Iraq instead of employing overwhelming force with extreme prejudice, left the borders wide open to the south, tried to sell softie Harriet Myers as a Supreme, and otherwise FUBAR.

And people wonder why WE lost the election?

This administration did not lead, so no one followed.


83 posted on 11/29/2006 4:24:18 AM PST by Stallone (Is There A Conservative Leader ANYWHERE In America?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: unkus
"The Rats don't care. Power is all they are interested in."

You are right of course. But why has not the Bush Administration made this point about the WMDs? If this retired General is correct, why is he only voicing this on the Internet website and not with the media? There are enough Conservative TV and Radio Talk Show Hosts who would have him on their respective shows. Or is this information still classified?
84 posted on 11/29/2006 4:53:10 AM PST by wmileo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wmileo

He's told people. I believe NEWSMAX and some others.

The press does not want to hear this stuff though.


85 posted on 11/29/2006 5:01:46 AM PST by ikez78 (www.regimeofterror.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: ikez78
"The press does not want to hear this stuff though."

Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh have shows with national appeal. They have a greater audience than NEWSMAX at this time. They could have him on. I listened to the 9+ minute clip and Gen. DeLong seems very credible to me.
86 posted on 11/29/2006 5:15:10 AM PST by wmileo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk; ikez78; jveritas

Gen. George Sada, one of Saddam's top Air Force guys, has been saying the same things since the toppling. Jveritas has done amazing work uncovering/posting many things that the LameStream Media has been ignoring/lying about.


87 posted on 11/29/2006 5:26:20 AM PST by unionblue83 (Duty is ours; consequences are God's. -- Stonewall Jackson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

Better alert the "No WMD's in Iraq" FINO's.....too


88 posted on 11/29/2006 5:29:20 AM PST by Osage Orange (The old/liberal/socialist media is the most ruthless and destructive enemy of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans

With all our intelligence why wasn't the transfer of WMD to Syria on tape of filmed or caught from pictures in the sky? How could no one see or speak up about this. How can you hide a transfer of WMD without no one knowing?


89 posted on 11/29/2006 5:53:55 AM PST by angcat ("IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BlueAngel

Nothing? Or not enough?


90 posted on 11/29/2006 6:11:23 AM PST by Valin (Rick Santorum 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: angcat
Simple, our satellites don't come with X-ray vision.
91 posted on 11/29/2006 6:13:29 AM PST by Valin (Rick Santorum 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Valin

HA cute!

I thought I killed the thread!


92 posted on 11/29/2006 6:19:38 AM PST by angcat ("IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: All

"Rifle" DeLong was at the core of Tommy Franks' inner circle. I assign him the precise credibility levels I assign to statements directly from Franks.

Common sense and historical fact gives Saddam a motive for shipping his WMD outside Iraq. We all saw what happened to the Iraqi Air Force during ODS, and I have posted a declassified Intelligence Advisory from 1991 detailing two WMD convoys to Iran on FR more than once before. (Available on request.)

The 1991 shipments to Iran used truck convoys, as supposedly claimed by DeLong, too.

Motive, method, and opportunity. You can win a legal case on this basis alone.

Why hasn't this been done?

We invaded Iraq to prevent the use or distribution of WMD, the same would apply to Iran or Syria.

I maintain that there have been military plans for Iran since 9/11, in the same drawer the Iraqi plans were in 2002, when they were "not on Bush's desk". This is the only logical explanation that still holds water for Bush esentially ignoring years of overt provocation from Iran. No need to respond to verbal jousting when regime change is in thw wings.

With 60 days to commit military force before seeking Legislative support being the standard of past presidencies, the fat lady has not begun to sing yet, in fact she is more than two years away from even leaving her house for the opera hall.

Wait and watch.


93 posted on 11/29/2006 6:55:38 AM PST by jeffers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ikez78
On June 9th [2004], the UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission briefed the Security Council about the export of Iraqi WMD, missile and nuclear components shipped out of Iraq before, during and after the invasion. As reported by MENL news service, UNMOVIC acting executive chairman Demetrius Perricos told the Council, "The removal of these materials from Iraq raises concerns with regard to proliferation risks," and said inspectors found Iraqi WMD and missile components shipped abroad that still contained UN inspection tags.

The World Tribune reported on Perricos's briefing. "He said the Iraqi facilities were dismantled and sent both to Europe and around the Middle East at the rate of about 1,000 tons of metal a month... The Baghdad missile site contained a range of WMD and dual-use components, UN officials said. They included missile components, reactor vessel and fermenters ... required for the production of chemical and biological warheads. 'It raises the question of what happened to the dual-use equipment, where is it now and what is it being used for,' Perricos's spokesman, said. 'You can make all kinds of pharmaceutical and medicinal products with a fermenter. You can also use it to breed anthrax.'"

Source

Retired Air Force Lt. Gen. James Clapper, head of the National Imagery and Mapping Agency, said vehicle traffic photographed by U.S. spy satellites indicated that material and documents related to the arms programs were shipped to Syria."

Source

"Last month Moshe Yaalon, who was Israel's top general at the time, said Iraq transported WMD to Syria six weeks before Operation Iraqi Freedom began.

Last March, John A. Shaw, a former U.S. deputy undersecretary of defense for international technology security, said Russian Spetsnaz units moved WMD to Syria and Lebanon's Bekaa Valley.

"While in Iraq I received information from several sources naming the exact Russian units, what they took and where they took both WMD materials and conventional explosives," Mr. Shaw told NewsMax reporter Charles Smith.

Retired Marine Lt. Gen. Michael DeLong was deputy commander of Central Command during Operation Iraqi Freedom. In September 2004, he told WABC radio that "I do know for a fact that some of those weapons went into Syria, Lebanon and Iran."

In January 2004, David Kay, the first head of the Iraq Survey Group which conducted the search for Saddam's WMD, told a British newspaper there was evidence unspecified materials had been moved to Syria from Iraq shortly before the war.

"We know from some of the interrogations of former Iraqi officials that a lot of material went to Syria before the war, including some components of Saddam's WMD program," Mr. Kay told the Sunday Telegraph.

Also that month, Nizar Nayuf, a Syrian journalist who defected to an undisclosed European country, told a Dutch newspaper he knew of three sites where Iraq's WMD was being kept. They were the town of al Baida near the city of Hama in northern Syria; the Syrian air force base near the village of Tal Snan, and the city of Sjinsar on the border with Lebanon.

In an addendum to his final report last April, Charles Duelfer, who succeeded David Kay as head of the Iraq Survey Group, said he couldn't rule out a transfer of WMD from Iraq to Syria.

"There was evidence of a discussion of possible WMD collaboration initiated by a Syrian security officer, and ISG received information about movement of material out of Iraq, including the possibility that WMD was involved. In the judgment of the working group, these reports were sufficiently credible to merit further investigation," Mr. Duelfer said."

Source

"The short answer to the question of where the WMD Saddam bought from the Russians went was that they went to Syria and Lebanon," former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense John A. Shaw told an audience Saturday at a privately sponsored "Intelligence Summit" in Alexandria, Va. (www.intelligencesummit.org).

Source

"We are not talking about a large stockpile of weapons," he said. "But we know from some of the interrogations of former Iraqi officials that a lot of material went to Syria before the war, including some components of Saddam's WMD programme. Precisely what went to Syria, and what has happened to it, is a major issue that needs to be resolved."

Source

"Two days before the war, on March 17th, we saw through multiple intelligence channels - both human intelligence and techinical (satellite,eavesdrop) intelligence - large caravans of people and things, including some of the top 55 Iraqis, going to Syria."

Source

94 posted on 11/29/2006 8:27:32 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: jeffers
Will you please stop making sense!
Wait and watch.
NO NO NO! I want to know right NOW! I want this to be just like a movie, where the hero saves the day and rides off into the sunset, all in 2 hours.
95 posted on 11/29/2006 8:45:48 AM PST by Valin (Rick Santorum 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
OK, what's a pan islamist.

Anyone who claims that Islam should be world dominant by whatever means neccessary, especially cutting your head off.

Lots of references on the web alone.

96 posted on 11/29/2006 8:52:04 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Before our entry into Iraq, I remember many FReepers talking about trucks lined up at the Syrian border, probably going into the Bekka Valley, full of WMDs. Since our ousting saydam, our screaming media presstitutes have been debunking the idea saydam had ANY such things. They say it's a myth put out by our President Bush's administration so we could invade Iraq. Of course the presstitutes know far more than any military general about WMDs and their whereabouts, so we DO NOT HEAR from the Generals in the REAL know of what's happening over there.


97 posted on 11/29/2006 10:08:58 AM PST by tillacum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

Well, in that case, I totally agree.


98 posted on 11/29/2006 10:12:16 AM PST by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

Eagles6, the talk shows won't touch Rick Santorum with a ten foot pole, 'cause he'll tell the truth and the talk shows are all part of the alphabet press. It won't be allowed.


99 posted on 11/29/2006 10:12:42 AM PST by tillacum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dan Evans
The media and other liberals have convinced the world that there were no WMDs. "Mission Accomplished". There is no reason to bring in additional information, opinions or facts that challenge the popular opinion.
100 posted on 11/29/2006 10:18:13 AM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson