Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justa-hairyape

technically you could say Russia used a nuclear weapon against a person on British soil.


12 posted on 12/05/2006 11:48:09 PM PST by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Cinnamon
technically you could say Russia used a nuclear weapon against a person on British soil.

Thanks. That is a technically better way to describe the matter. Also, he was more then just a person. He was a British citizen. So perhaps we should state it as follows to be technically correct - The investigation points to the high probability that a Russian citizen used a nuclear weapon against a British citizen on British soil. Now if that does not warrant a UN investigation, we do not need a UN whatsoever.

15 posted on 12/06/2006 12:16:36 AM PST by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Cinnamon
technically you could say Russia used a nuclear weapon against a person on British soil.

Let's not say that, okay? That would invoke a US response via NATO on our NBC policy. Meaning it would get very warm in Moscow. Very warm.

44 posted on 12/06/2006 9:31:23 AM PST by PeterFinn (B’fhearr Gaeilge briste na Béarla cliste.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Cinnamon

Agreed. Britain has every right to complete justice in this matter. Russians poisoned London.


58 posted on 12/07/2006 8:24:01 AM PST by GVnana (Former Alias: GVgirl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson