technically you could say Russia used a nuclear weapon against a person on British soil.
Thanks. That is a technically better way to describe the matter. Also, he was more then just a person. He was a British citizen. So perhaps we should state it as follows to be technically correct - The investigation points to the high probability that a Russian citizen used a nuclear weapon against a British citizen on British soil. Now if that does not warrant a UN investigation, we do not need a UN whatsoever.
Let's not say that, okay? That would invoke a US response via NATO on our NBC policy. Meaning it would get very warm in Moscow. Very warm.
Agreed. Britain has every right to complete justice in this matter. Russians poisoned London.