Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog Gone

After so long a period of time they have commited no crime nor are guilty of no crime.

So, I think the mint actually has no claim to the coins whatsoever.

And that is why they caved before and will probley do so again.


25 posted on 12/14/2006 4:36:48 PM PST by stockpirate (John Kerry & FBI files ==> http://www.freerepublic.com/~stockpirate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: stockpirate

Let me understand your reasoning.

My grandfather steals something from your grandfather. I show it to you, and you say, hey, that's stolen property which belongs to your grandfather. And your statement is a true statement.

I say, give it back or I'll sue you.

And I'm correct and should win that suit?


26 posted on 12/14/2006 4:48:20 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: stockpirate
After so long a period of time they have commited no crime nor are guilty of no crime.

The statute of limitations is just a limitation on prosecuting them and sending them to prison for theft. There is no time limitation on recovering stolen property. Museums have been forced to return property that was stolen even after being in the museum's possession for over 200 years.

37 posted on 12/14/2006 6:26:12 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson