Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Flash Bazbeaux
They didn't take the property, the lady gave them the property.

The lady loaned the mint the property. It is clear that the lady expected the mint to return them and the mint clearly lead her to believe that they would be returned.

54 posted on 12/14/2006 10:57:57 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: staytrue

"They didn't take the property, the lady gave them the property."

"The lady loaned the mint the property. It is clear that the lady expected the mint to return them and the mint clearly lead her to believe that they would be returned."

Assuming you are correct as to the lady's expectations, then IF she was the true owner of the property, and she was tricked into giving it up, that would be "larceny by trick". However, if the Mint is the true owner, the facts as to what the lady thought really don't amount to a hoot in H@ll.

A person is generally permitted to recover his or her own property from one who wrongfully possesses it by "self-help", as long as there is no breach of the peace. Tricking someone does not breach the peace.


58 posted on 12/15/2006 7:25:42 AM PST by Flash Bazbeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson