Posted on 12/26/2006 7:48:19 PM PST by jdm
I grew up in the US during the 1970s, the one decade universally acknowledged to have truly sucked. In 1970s America we danced to disco music, wore leisure suits and watched the Brady Bunch. But if that wasn't torture enough, we had Jimmy Carter as our president.
I can still recall how depressing it was to watch his taciturn face on TV announcing one catastrophe after another, from the skyrocketing misery index, to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, to the capture of our hostages in Iran, to the tragically-botched rescue attempt to free them.
Jimmy Carter was arguably the most hapless president in all American history, and indeed, today most presidential historians today rate him at or near the very bottom of the list.
Ronald Reagan was able to crush Carter at the polls with the simple slogan "Morning in America," a tacit acknowledgement that under Carter's watch it had been a cold midnight across the fruited plain.
But with the publication of Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, his ignorant rant against Israel, many in the American Jewish community believe that Carter is not just a loser but an anti-Semite. I disagree.
Jimmy Carter is not so much anti-Semite as anti-intellectual, not so much a Jew-hater as a boor. The real explanation behind his limitless hostility to Israel is a total lack of any moral understanding.
Carter wants to do what's just. His heart's in the right place. He just can't figure out what the right is. He is, and always has been, a man of good intentions bereft of good judgment. He invariably finds himself defending tyrants and dictators at the expense of their oppressed peoples. Not because he is a bad man, but because he is a confused man.
CARTER SUBSCRIBES to what I call the Always Root for the Underdog school of morality. Rather than develop any real understanding of a conflict, immediately he sides with the weaker party, however wicked or immoral.
Israel has tanks and F-16's. The Palestinians don't. Therefore the Palestinians are being oppressed. Never mind that the Palestinians have rejected every offer to live side by side with Israel in peace and elected a government pledged to Israel's annihilation. Their poverty dictates the righteousness of their cause even if their actions speak otherwise.
If Israel builds a barrier to cordon off the Palestinians, it is not to prevent their suicide bombers from dismembering children but to punish them for having darker skin.
Carter's obsession with the unrighteous underdog has embarrassed him many times before. It was what motivated him to visit and legitimize Fidel Castro and take his side in a bio-weapons dispute with the United States. Castro runs a tiny island in the shadow of the world's superpower. He must therefore perforce be a victim of American bullying, even if he is a brutal dictator and tyrant.
Championing the unrighteous underdog also led Carter to praise the murderous North Korean tyrant Kim Il Sung with these words: "I find him to be vigorous, intelligent... and in charge of the decisions about this country." Carter added, "I don't see that [the North Koreans] are an outlaw nation."
He also hailed Marshal Joseph Tito as "a man who believes in human rights," and said of the murderous Romanian dictator Ceausescu: "Our goals are the same: to have a just system of economics and politics... We believe in enhancing human rights."
Championing the underdog also had Carter tell the Haitian dictator Raul C dras that he was "ashamed of what my country has done to your country."
AS A MARITAL counselor I have met many well-meaning arbitrators who always take the side of the wife in an ugly dispute in the belief that a woman, inherently weaker than her husband, is always the innocent and aggrieved party. Even where the evidence points to the wife as being violent and unreasonable, such arbitrators cannot conceive of the husband as anything but the oppressor.
Needless to say, such arbitrators cause more harm than good, which is why Jimmy Carter would make an even worse marital counselor than he was president.
No, Carter is not anti-Semitic so much as a man whose lack of judgment and shallowness render him absolutely incapable of telling right from wrong.
Carter's obscene comparison of Israel with apartheid South Africa ignores the fact that Israel is the first country to airlift tens of thousands of black Africans to become free and full citizens in its borders, a phenomenon that has no precedent in the history of the world.
But by saying that the Palestinians are being subjected to apartheid Carter has grossly maligned not Jews, but black South Africans. Whereas black South Africans inspired the world with their humane capacity for forgiveness and peaceful coexistence with their white brethren, even after having been so egregiously wronged, the Palestinians have unfortunately embraced murderous hatred and racism. Arab newspapers routinely publish grotesque caricatures of Jews, and the Palestinians teach kindergarten children to grow up and blow up Israeli buses.
Nelson Mandela rose to become the world's greatest statesman with his articulation of brotherhood and reconciliation. But Yasser Arafat fathered international terrorism and stole hundreds of millions of dollars from his own people.
Which leads to one conclusion: Before one runs around the world as a global do-gooder, one should first develop the ability to identify the good.
Can you possibly image what the main stream press would have done to this guy had he been a Republican?
Oh, please! Who cares if he realizes he's evil or not. Did Hitler and Stalin realize they were evil? The effect of his writings and dealings is to promote dictatorships and suffering. He doesn't care two s**ts about the underdog. He cares about discrediting and destroying America. Enough of this pop psychobabble!
Because some of his best friends are Jews?
Slam and dunk!
Nonsense.
Subtracting a sufficient element of mens rea from his behavior is tantamount to an insanity defense.
I can see that.
There's a type of Southerner, usually a small-town middle class social climber, who can't STAND Jews. They haven't got any good reason, they're just suspicious that somehow they haven't risen in life as they should have, and they just want somebody to blame. You'll see small town dowagers hold this view as well as losers like Carter -- it's fairly common among older Southerners of that type but thankfully seems to be dying out in the younger generation.
I think in Carter's case he managed to hide his mean-spirited and bigoted attitudes for many years, but now in his old age he can't seem to control himself as well as he used to. Maybe it's creeping senility, I dunno.
He has always been a mean and vengeful little man. Just now everybody knows it.
Cuz he's clueless and incompetent?
In Catechism class I learned that to sin three conditions must exist. (1) The act must be evil. (2) The person must know the act is evil. (3) The person must freely choose to perform the evil act. As every eight-year-old with an ounce of reasoning capability concludes: If you are really stupid, you have it made. Carter has it made.
"If I get back in, I'm going to f*ck the Jews."
--President Jimmy Carter, 1980"
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=25746
In Dangerous Liaison: The Inside Story of the U.S.-Israeli Covert Relationship, Andrew and Leslie Cockburn revealed that during a March 1980 meeting with his senior political advisers, Carter, discussing his fading reelection prospects and his sinking approval rating in the Jewish community, snapped, “If I get back in, I’m going to [expletive] the Jews.”
I thought the 70's were great! We had the best muscle cars and good rock, (only dweebs listened to disco and wore those stupid "Mod" leisure suits, shirts with large collars unbuttoned half ways, thick and cheap gold plated chains, beetle boots, and completed the look with an afro, whether you were white or not) and they finally invented a cassette player for cars.
Obviously this guy makes up his facts of convenience. Morning In America was a slogan from the 1984 re-election cmpaign. Not 1980.
Forgive me, but didn't Reagan crush Mondale with that slogan?
Maybe it's creeping senility, I dunno.
I am sure it is and I think he has had it for a long time. I am still mad over him telling us we shouldn't put up Christmas lights to conserve energy. And don't forget his ratty sweater he always wore. I can't and I have tried many times to think of a single thing he has done besides Habitat for Humanity.....He didn't start it either. In 1968, Millard Fuller, businessman and lawyer from Alabama, and Dr. Clarence Jordan, founder of Koinonia Farms in Americus, Georgia, began work to eliminate substandard housing in Sumter County, Georgia. Jimmy Carter became a volunteer in 1986. Thats the best thing I can think of he did though I could be wrong...
Someone needs to put the bong down before starting to type.
How else can inane statements like this make their way into print? "Nelson Mandela rose to become the world's greatest statesman with his articulation of brotherhood and reconciliation."
Necklacing is reconciliation? And in just what way did the slightly reformed African tribal nut and his infamous wife help Aouth Africa? Other than help it to start down the path that Rhodesia travelled?
That's about as good a summation of Carter as you're ever going to get.
Emphasis mine.
He is not wise enough to realize he is evil.
Actually the best thing he did was to have a daughter and NO sons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.