[RushingWater]

Instead of complaining, please offer some solutions. Something must be done about I35, there must be some relief.

In any private business transaction, the initial offer generally will ask for more than what will ultimately be granted. So, in this case, sounds like some strike throughs for the non-compete clauses is in order.

[Ben Ficklin]

Just because the author of this article says the non-compete clause is egregious doesn't mean it is.

There was info on the non-compete clause in the document release a few months ago. The Austin American Statesman assessed the non-compete clause a being very similar to the non-compete clause for Hwy 130, which seemed reasonable to me.

The operator gets a 10 mile buffer zone. If TxDot builds something detrimental, it has to pay the operator. TxDot can also build something that benefits the operator and use it as an offset.

[wolfcreek]

"Instead of complaining, please offer some solutions. Something must be done about I35, there must be some relief."


#1 Population stabilization

#2 Quit getting in such a damn rush and take an alternate route.

#3 Tell Perry to go jump in the lake. (especially if there's no water in it)

#4 Don't allow foreign interests to supersede the interests of Texans.