Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Constitution Party to Select Candidate By July
Conservative President | Tuesday, December 05, 2006

Posted on 01/02/2007 9:25:56 PM PST by TBP

http://conservativepresident2008.blogspot.com/2006/12/constitution-party-to-select-candidate.html

The Constitution Party, a conservative third party founded in 1992 to serve as a possible ticket for Pat Buchanan to run on, plans to have nominated its candidate for President by July 2007, World Net Daily reports.

The party held a national committee meeting last weekend where Howard Phillips, who is the party's founder and three time Presidential candidate (1992, 1996 and 2000), told World Net Daily "The time has never been better for a third party dark horse candidate to grab the White House."

Phillips said that the party will nominate candidate next year and among the possibilities are: Jim Gilchrist, former Republican presidential candidate Alan Keyes, Pastor Chuck Baldwin and World Net Daily columnist Jerome Corsi.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1percent; baldwin; baldwn; candidate; cantcriticizegop; constitution; constitutionalists; constitutionparty; corsi; cp; crazyuncleeddie; election2008; garagebandparty; gilchrist; gilchrit; goconstitution; howardphillips; irrelevancerampant; keyes; leftwinggop; liberalgop; limitedgovernment; meetinginmomscellar; nominee; peroutka; peroutks; phillips; president; principle; principled; realconservatives; thirdparty; thirdpartylosers; trueconservatives; voteconstitution; wastedvotes; whocares; worthlessnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-318 next last
The WorldNetDaily article referenced also includes this:

"The Constitution Party is also strongly supportive of Republican Congressmen Tom Tancredo and Ron Paul, but there is no decision yet that either would leave their home in the Republican Party to pursue a Constitution Party nomination. Tancredo has said numerous times he is considering a run for the presidency.

"The American public are angry at both the Democratic and Republican Party," Phillips said. "If neither major party wants to listen to the American middle class, the Constitution Party is ready to enter center stage and get back to the basics that have made the republic established by our founding fathers work for over 230 years."

Well, we'll see.

The Constitution Party does seem intent on being first out of the gate, however.

1 posted on 01/02/2007 9:26:03 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TBP
World Net Daily columnist Jerome Corsi.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....ok, I'm done....No, wait...BWHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

I think I just gave myself a hernia.

2 posted on 01/02/2007 9:29:08 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP


Pipe dreams.
We have a two party system for POTUS.


3 posted on 01/02/2007 9:29:23 PM PST by onyx (Phillip Rivers, LT and the San Diego Chargers! WOO-HOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
"The Constitution Party is also strongly supportive of Republican Congressmen Tom Tancredo and Ron Paul, but there is no decision yet that either would leave their home in the Republican Party to pursue a Constitution Party nomination. Tancredo has said numerous times he is considering a run for the presidency.

And the day Tancredo jumps ship and runs third party is the day we are assured to have President Hillary Clinton or President Osama Obama.

4 posted on 01/02/2007 9:31:54 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Bush Derangement Syndrome Has Reached Pandemic Levels on Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Conservative my a** Below is from lthe const. web site.
It is no different than the left wing anti war idiots.
CONSTITUTION PARTY IS NOT CONSERVATIVE
see below



Terrorism and Personal Liberty
America is engaged in an undeclared war with an ill-defined enemy (terrorism), a war which threatens to be never ending, and which is being used to vastly expand government power, particularly that of the executive branch, at the expense of the individual liberties of the American people.

The "war on terrorism" is serving as an excuse for the government to spend beyond its income, expand the Federal bureaucracy, and socialize the nation through taxpayer bailouts of the airlines, subsidies to the giant insurance corporations, and other Federal programs.

the from their web site


5 posted on 01/02/2007 9:34:22 PM PST by SoCalPol (We Need A Border Fence Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

He won't attract that many votes. They never do and Ralph or another leftie kook will drain from the democrats.


6 posted on 01/02/2007 9:36:03 PM PST by onyx (Phillip Rivers, LT and the San Diego Chargers! WOO-HOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TBP
These people will just help the liberal Democrats by splitting the conservative vote.
7 posted on 01/02/2007 9:38:18 PM PST by MarkM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
He'll draw just enough. He'll get the racists, xenophobes, and other assorted far right wing kooks while at the same time casting conservatives as a bunch of racist xenophobes and pushing Hispanics deeper into the Democrat column.

Of course, this is exactly what the Tancredo brigades want. They want to destroy the GOP just as much as the Democrats do.

8 posted on 01/02/2007 9:40:46 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Bush Derangement Syndrome Has Reached Pandemic Levels on Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Also, Your Ron Paul who is anti war has been named as one of her favorites by Cindy Sheehan


9 posted on 01/02/2007 9:45:13 PM PST by SoCalPol (We Need A Border Fence Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkM
These people will just help the liberal Democrats by splitting the conservative vote.

None of the names mentioned above could get enough votes to make an impact. The GOP candidate only has to fear a charismatic conservative or populist running as an Independent.

10 posted on 01/02/2007 9:48:30 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Most of us who want to stop the illegals hate the above type as much as you do. Don't lump us all together.


11 posted on 01/02/2007 9:48:36 PM PST by SoCalPol (We Need A Border Fence Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
It would take a candidate like Ross Perot to throw the race to the democrat. Tancerdo is no Ross Perot who appealed to voters for several reasons. The CP, Libertarian, Green, etc. always have their little followings. Every presidential year is proclaimed to be "their year."

I would ONLY be concerned about a third party candidate if that candidate is John McCain, running as an Independent.

12 posted on 01/02/2007 9:50:18 PM PST by onyx (Phillip Rivers, LT and the San Diego Chargers! WOO-HOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: onyx
"We have a two party system for POTUS."

Very true. I tend to lean libertarian, but unless something major happens, I'll always vote republican in presidential elections. Unless the candidate is a total fool, but that would have to make them more of a fool than the democrat, which is very unlikely.

13 posted on 01/02/2007 9:54:57 PM PST by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

Are you sure that's not from the DNC web site ...


14 posted on 01/02/2007 9:56:28 PM PST by clamper1797 (Kerry does support the troops ... just not ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

Exactly right. You're a smart and pragmatic voter!


15 posted on 01/02/2007 9:57:04 PM PST by onyx (Phillip Rivers, LT and the San Diego Chargers! WOO-HOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797

just google const. party and ther it is.
Just another anti war party


16 posted on 01/02/2007 9:59:46 PM PST by SoCalPol (We Need A Border Fence Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TBP

A third party is something that no one who is serious about their country's future can even consider. Did we not learn this lesson when Bill Clinton was inaugurated with 43% of the vote in January, 1993? Good grief.

Oh, and don't look for the Constitution Party to do anything but undermine the (most significant in U.S. history) war against terrorists.

Finally, the Constitution Party is not pro-life. They claim that they are so, but down deep, the Constitution Party supports legal abortion as much as Democrats.


17 posted on 01/02/2007 10:06:19 PM PST by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

BTW, I can guess who the LP candidate will be. Can you?


18 posted on 01/02/2007 10:10:06 PM PST by AmishDude (It doesn't matter whom you vote for. It matters who takes office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Ooooh Pick me! Pick Me!


19 posted on 01/02/2007 10:13:58 PM PST by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

LP, CP, etc. put dems in office.
Always vote Republican.


20 posted on 01/02/2007 10:16:55 PM PST by SoCalPol (We Need A Border Fence Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-318 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson