Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"Even if you've done something for a bad reason, even if your corrupt no matter what as long as your being a DA, you have an absolute immunity."

Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

1 posted on 01/19/2007 8:38:25 PM PST by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: freespirited
OK,so the DA him/herself is immune....but the county who employs said DA can be sued for serious $$$ because of the DA's breathtaking incompetence or misconduct.
2 posted on 01/19/2007 8:42:49 PM PST by Gay State Conservative ("The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."-Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

Judges have it even better, they can make up Law on the spot and are for the most part unaccountable

TT


3 posted on 01/19/2007 8:43:59 PM PST by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

Citing the same sentence, being a reporter means never having to say, "My grammar sucks."


4 posted on 01/19/2007 8:45:02 PM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

One set of rules for the peasants, another set of rules for the Lords.


6 posted on 01/19/2007 8:47:45 PM PST by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
if lawyers can prove Niflong acted outside the scope of his duties as DA

Ok, I'll bite. What duty does a DA have to hold press conferences and lie to the general public during them? Where is this duty specifically spelled out in law or in Constitution?

7 posted on 01/19/2007 8:49:34 PM PST by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
But according to Beskind, if lawyers can prove Niflong acted outside the scope of his duties as DA, he could lose his immunity.

He was acting as a candidate.

8 posted on 01/19/2007 8:50:00 PM PST by umgud (The profound is only so to those that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

It's an interesting conundrum. If DAs weren't solidly protected against frivolous lawsuits, they couldn't accomplish anything. But Nifong's behavior was so egregious, maybe they can find some grounds. For instance, maybe they could make the argument that he was not acting within his capacity as a DA, but was turning the case into a campaign issue to get himself re-elected.

It might be hard to prove, though. Intentions are difficult unless there is some written statement or solid evidence for them.

In any case, I think Nifong is washed up and will be eased out of office, because he has caused so much trouble for the politicians and DAs throughout the whole state. It makes them look bad, and I doubt they'll put up with it.


10 posted on 01/19/2007 8:52:41 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

"In this case lawyers would have to prove Nifong not only did these things but also knew he was violating the law."

Prove it or not... Nifong's actions in this case have so tainted him that -- for all practical purposes -- his career may be over anyway.


11 posted on 01/19/2007 8:59:15 PM PST by STE=Q ("Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock." (Will Rogers))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
Civil cases are the least of his worries. If he were to go down for some criminal actions, he could be 'bunk mates' with some of the 'fella's he sent to the poky.

Problem is, he'd most likely face either criminal or civil in courts of the Banana Republic of Durham. Not a hotbed of justice these days.

13 posted on 01/19/2007 9:04:26 PM PST by nctexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

Read John Grisham's An Innocent Man.
The laws may have changed in the last 2-4 years, but I doubt it...


14 posted on 01/19/2007 9:05:20 PM PST by HiJinx (Ask me about support for the Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
Lawyer: DAs Have Protection From Lawsuits

Fine, tar and feather the bastard.

16 posted on 01/19/2007 9:07:11 PM PST by Centurion2000 (If you're not being shot at, it's not a high stress job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin

bump


17 posted on 01/19/2007 9:07:49 PM PST by DvdMom (Impeach Nifong -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
True.
And Nifong is without doubt, corrupt.
The three young men Nifong maliciously prosecuted deserve at the very minimum, that Nifong and "others" stand formally indicted in a public trial venue for malicious prosecution.
In this case, the accusers identity must also be made public, since rape charges have been dropped.
She and her family had fun for a time, while they were gaming the "justice" system.
Name them ALL, so the next woman raped who refuses to press charges, at least knows the name of all the people who conspired against her.
18 posted on 01/19/2007 9:09:19 PM PST by sarasmom ( War is not the most vile of the evils humanity commits . There is always apathy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

Interesting read:

It was all about Election Day.

By Thomas Sowell

>http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=Nzc3NTE4NzY1ZTdlZTY5ODZjOThkNjQ3ZTJjZWI4Mjc=<


23 posted on 01/19/2007 9:27:49 PM PST by STE=Q ("Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock." (Will Rogers))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

um...is subornation of perjury a felony ?

leaving out exculpatory evidence and getting the forensic guy to go along with it is what ?


24 posted on 01/19/2007 9:29:49 PM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
Under state law, district attorneys have what's called absolute immunity from civil suits, meaning they can't be sued.

Okay, fine. Does this immunity protect him from a blanket party in a dark parking lot?

26 posted on 01/19/2007 9:40:40 PM PST by TheSpottedOwl (If you don't understand the word "Illegal", then the public school system has failed you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

It's called a "Bivens claim". Look it up. That a lawyer doesn't know that, is telling.


30 posted on 01/19/2007 10:16:47 PM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

Not for a federal civil rights violation.


36 posted on 01/19/2007 11:01:49 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Democrat Happens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited
Forget Nifong. No deep pockets there.

Will end as follows

1. Cases will be dismissed with "semi-applolgies."
2. State will settle with students for two to five million each, plus lawyer's fees.
3. Dancer/Hooker will get "help" so she can "get on with her life" Help means $, probably $10,000.
41 posted on 01/20/2007 12:11:37 AM PST by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 in Vietnam meant never having to say I was sorry......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freespirited

PS,

Nifong, in his book, will blame the Durham cops.


42 posted on 01/20/2007 12:13:46 AM PST by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 in Vietnam meant never having to say I was sorry......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson