According to my sister in Albuquerque:
"Someone" put an unauthorized dirt road over Site A. They put a water pipe-line through Site B. These sites were clearly marked, notification made, professors marked them, and yet these ~10,000 year old sites are ruined and the artifacts, destroyed.
Alb Public Schools denies making the dirt road. Contractors won't admit to it either. But....APS says it's a 'wonderful opportunity' to put the knowledge that the site WAS there in the curriculum for the future students!
Maxwell Museum of Anthropology on the UNM campus had given APS maps of the sites. These sites were clearly marked, notification made, professors marked them.
To: SunkenCiv
2 posted on
01/29/2007 4:51:20 PM PST by
ApplegateRanch
(Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
To: ApplegateRanch
Dig a deep enough hole and you'll find evidence of something "archeological." If we are to stop progress every time we find a bone fragment, we might as well move back into mud huts.
Bottom line? Turn Mesa Verde into condos for all I care.
3 posted on
01/29/2007 4:54:28 PM PST by
IronJack
(=)
To: ApplegateRanch
which was discovered by Huckell eight years ago. They have had eight years to excavate the site, what was he on the 50 year plan?
4 posted on
01/29/2007 4:55:32 PM PST by
Michael.SF.
(It's time our lawmakers paid more attention to their responsibilities, and less to their privileges.)
To: ApplegateRanch
Okay, long story short.
Growing up in NW Albuquerque, I had a chance to see UNM archaeologists in work. They stopped by my friends house, we were 13, and talked to his father about the adobe ruins he had in the lot behind his backyard. They described them as an important find and worth preserving and investigating.
The property owner laughed his butt off. He told them they could poke around, but the adobe bricks they saw were the leftovers from when they had put up the wall around their backyard.
The aspiring archaeologist were a bit embarrassed.
To: ApplegateRanch
...the site is possibly up to ten-thousand-900 years old.Which means that it is also possibly ten years old.
7 posted on
01/29/2007 5:55:52 PM PST by
FreePaul
To: ApplegateRanch; blam; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; ...
8 posted on
01/30/2007 8:18:40 AM PST by
SunkenCiv
("In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, they're not." -- John Rummel)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson