Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Weldon: Democrat Leadership Raids NASA Budget
spaceref.com ^ | January 31, 2007 | Rep. Dave Weldon

Posted on 02/01/2007 9:45:45 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo

PRESS RELEASE
Date Released: Wednesday, January 31, 2007
< Source: Rep. Dave Weldon

If Enacted, Would Be Worst Cuts to Space Exploration Since 1993

Urges Senate to Reverse Irresponsible Choice by House Dems

In a fiscal year 2007 budget released today, the new Democrat majority proposed sweeping cuts to NASA's budget that could jeopardized the future of space exploration. U.S. Rep. Dave Weldon, M.D. (R-FL), who represents many workers from NASA and Kennedy Space Center, called the cuts draconian, saying the Democrat leadership is using NASA and our nation's space program as a piggy bank for other liberal spending priorities.

"The raid on NASA's budget has begun in earnest. The cuts announced today by House Democrat leaders, if approved by Congress, would be nearly $400 million less than NASA's current budget," said Weldon.

"Clearly, the new Democrat leadership in the House isn't interested in space exploration. Their omnibus proposal lists hundreds of new increases, including a $1.3 billion increase‹over 40% for a Global AIDS fund, all at the expense of NASA."

Much of the proposed cuts would come from NASA's Exploration budget, which includes funding for the new Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV), the future replacement for the current shuttle fleet. According to Weldon, these particular cuts would jeopardize thousands of jobs in Florida, Alabama, and Texas.

Weldon today led a bi-partisan group of colleagues, including Reps. Ralph Hall (D-TX), and Tom Feeney (R-FL), in offering two amendments to the bill that would restore NASA's funding.

"Rank-and-file Democrats and Republicans alike are aghast at the treatment the Democrat Leadership has shown to NASA. To gut the exploration account in particular is clearly meant to be a stick in the eye to the President and the initiative he announced three years ago."

Speaker Pelosi is not expected to allow any amendments to today's omnibus bill, continuing the closed legislative process that has plagued the current Congress since its opening day. Consequently, Weldon said the future of NASA funding will likely hinge on the Senate.

"The Senate leadership, including Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL), has yet to speak to the draconian cuts being proposed. I hope they're alerted to the message the House sent today and will propose funding in line with NASA's overall mission and the President's original request to ensure a smooth transition to the new launch vehicle."


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: budget; budgetcuts; congress; democrats; nasa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-194 next last
To: napscoordinator

Not going to try to change the mind of some one who has it made up. But you do remind me of several things. People used to say the world was flat... they found out is wasn't, They thought if man were meant to fly he would have been given wings... today flight is a fact of life. Columbus' expedition was considered a waste of money. Flight was considered a waste of money. So you would rather enable the victim mentality of another generation of "Plebes" than take a leap of faith. Good for you. You can stay here on earth with both feet on the ground while the rest of us reach for the stars and our dreams.

The mere fact that you can sit at a computer today is thanks to the space program. But its a waste of money. You remind me of a democrat.


41 posted on 02/01/2007 10:29:44 AM PST by SouthernBoyupNorth ("For my wings are made of Tungsten, my flesh of glass and steel..........")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker
But at the current time, the cost is prohibitive and the benefits are nil.

That's a reasonable conclusion. Current NASA plans don't seriously address the R&D required to enable molecular nanotechnology (MNT), that could eventually open the door to new possibilities for manned space hardware development and operations.

Molecular Nanotechnology (Wikipedia)

42 posted on 02/01/2007 10:30:12 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
They can throw cheap rocks from the moon. Target your home, your town, your state with rocks with cheap thrusters.

It would be no problem for us to shoot "them" down before they get to the moon, and it wouldn't require astronauts.

43 posted on 02/01/2007 10:31:54 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ASH71

Wow. 273 out of a country of 300 million. That sounds like getting our money's worth...Can you imagine what we could have done with all that money?


44 posted on 02/01/2007 10:32:28 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

I believe they were saying that about Russia only a little while ago...In the 40's they were saying Learn German. Your scare tactics are fine, but it is costing us money.


45 posted on 02/01/2007 10:33:38 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Even Earth-based telescopes, with new adaptive optic technology at high-altitude sites are exceeding capabilities once thought only possible from a lunar observatory or orbit.


46 posted on 02/01/2007 10:34:01 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Did you miss the post that showed all of the inventions you are now using because of the space program?


47 posted on 02/01/2007 10:35:07 AM PST by listenhillary (You can lead a man to reason, but you can't make him think)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ASH71
Try typing into Google "Nasa Inventions"

Interesting point. Many years ago, I was visiting the Kennedy Space Center in FL and, while wandering around the tourist center I stumbled into an unmarked room off to the side that was packed with commercial products that have been brought into our lives as a result of the manned space program. It was eye opening to say the least. . . . . and astonishing that the room was unmarked. The investment in manned space exploration may seem like money squandered . . . . . . just like the computer we are all typing our comments on to be posted to this website. One way or another, there is a connection (direct or indirect) to the manned space program.

48 posted on 02/01/2007 10:36:16 AM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo

You would shoot the Chinese astronauts on their way to the moon? For what reason?

We're not going to use it, why shouldn't the Chinese?


49 posted on 02/01/2007 10:36:39 AM PST by listenhillary (You can lead a man to reason, but you can't make him think)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
I went to a lecture with one of the scientists who came over from Germany with von Braun.

Do a search on Operation Paperclip. My dad was a career AF officer and part of that operation.

50 posted on 02/01/2007 10:38:50 AM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SouthernBoyupNorth

Well I can assure you that I am not a Democrat and just because I agree with you on probably 99.99 percent of the issues that we have does not make me sound like a Democrat, but I do appreciate your post and although I know that we have had some great inventions from space, I still don't like spending the money.


51 posted on 02/01/2007 10:40:59 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

Did they post it today? I did not see it.


52 posted on 02/01/2007 10:41:41 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
Long before the Chinese have an operating offensive capability on the moon, we would see it and take steps to shut it down.

The best weapon the Chinese will ever have is a hidden nuke in a shipping container.

53 posted on 02/01/2007 10:42:34 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Uh-huh. And China shooting down a satellite isn't of any concern to you?


54 posted on 02/01/2007 10:43:35 AM PST by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL ( **Hunter-Tancredo-Weldon-Hayworth 4 President**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

Do you feel comfortable with China having the proverbial high ground?


55 posted on 02/01/2007 10:44:21 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo

How do you know it is an offensive capability? Are you going to watch from the space station or the ground?


56 posted on 02/01/2007 10:44:54 AM PST by listenhillary (You can lead a man to reason, but you can't make him think)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1777445/posts#18


57 posted on 02/01/2007 10:45:24 AM PST by listenhillary (You can lead a man to reason, but you can't make him think)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL
Uh-huh. And China shooting down a satellite isn't of any concern to you?

Please realize that China destroyed a satellite using a rocket launched from the ground as it passed through its "airspace", 500 miles up. A moonbase would not improve their ability to shoot down satellites, give the distance of 240,000 miles.

58 posted on 02/01/2007 10:46:39 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Did you read the article? The cuts to NASA aren't going to save any money. And even if they did, you wouldn't get any of it. The 'Rats are just going to spend that money (and more) on their pet projects, which means "social programs".

My guess is that means increased welfare payments. More free money for people who stay home and don't do any work. Well, diss NASA and its workers if you want, but at least they show up for work.

59 posted on 02/01/2007 10:48:26 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

So you're going to give up your computer?

The internet and the computer you access it with are all products of the space program.


60 posted on 02/01/2007 10:50:03 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-194 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson