Posted on 02/02/2007 10:39:18 AM PST by Antoninus
Go Hunter! Bump
No it's not. He's a protectionist and would ruin the economy.
Hunter bump as well!
Excellent article. The original link should be forwarded to everyone you know that doesn't keep up with politics full time.
There are only two objections I have to Hunter:
1) I don't think he can win, and
2) I don't like his protectionist trade ideas.
four words: No Chance In Hell
Hunkin Dunker is another GOP social conservative/fiscal liberal insider hack from a gerrymandered district and has as much chance as being the next POTUS as Custer's Bugler.
http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2006/10/duncan_hunters_voting_record.php
It didn't take long for the boo birds to come out. LOL!
Hunter is the man!
The conservative case against him:
1. He's a lifetime pol from a safe district who's spent most of his adult life in Congress.
2. Nominee Hunter = President Hillary.
I saw Hunter on Cavuto's show yesterday. It was the first time I saw him in an interview and I liked what I heard.
Oh, I also forgot, he's anti-free trade and pro-earmarks.
I notice your case doesn't actually include any of the stances he takes on the issues.
LOL. They are not even close. This is the reason I will be voting for Hunter. Plus, he is no rino.
He scares the Rockefeller/Country club wing of the party. I like that.
"he's anti-free trade"
Is he? Or is he for fair trade?
#2 doesn't need stances.
#1 also doesn't. Just the fact that he's been in Congress most of his adult life means it's highly unlikely he'll be the kind of person we need in office.
But that said, if you insist:
http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2006/10/duncan_hunters_voting_record.php
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.