From the article:
"In the interview, the former first lady said the Bush administration forced an end to the final round of weapons inspections and invaded prematurely. The administration is responsible for the current status of the war, she said, and for being "grossly misinformed" or for having "twisted the intelligence to satisfy a preconceived version of the facts" before the invasion.
"Either interpretation casts grave doubt on their judgment," she said. "If they were so intent on pursuing military action, a pre-emptive action, which I said at the time I opposed, against Saddam Hussein, then why on earth were they not better prepared and more competent in its execution?"
Bush "grossly misinformed" Hillary so she should get a pass on supporting him with her vote, but in the same conversation, Hillary says grave doubts should be placed on Bush for being "grossly misinformed".
Double-speak or double-standards?
I forgot to acknowledge the source:
#1 is my own (I was so sick of Germans saying to me "Bush is so arrogant - how could he say "you are either for us or against us?" that I had to find the evidence that the Euroweenies liberal hero Hillllllary actually said it first!)
#2-#10 were compiled in a recent WSJ piece and re-worded in a NewsMax recap of it.