Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thehumanlynx
Thats fine, your comments remind me of someone who is arrogant beyond belief.

Who would that be?

By the way, it's called realistic.

Because the conversation you engaged in does not belong in this thread does not mean I'm ignorant of argumentation or scared of it or an enemy of it.

Why would you care about a thread that is a week old and has few responses that are relevant to its subject matter? Why would you be bothered if two people chose to debate about argumentation?

Your commments also remind me of someone that would respond better to a few swift kicks, and maybe a hook and a cross. I tend to think that you will take delight in that b/c you think that since I referred to physicality that you "got me", but I can't help what things remind me of.

Not at all. I didn't get you. You got yourself.
246 posted on 03/03/2007 3:45:25 PM PST by LtdGovt ("Where government moves in, community retreats and civil society disintegrates" -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]


To: LtdGovt
By the way, it's called realistic.

I agree, it is realistic to believe that you are arrogant.

You display contempt for the study of argumentation

Omniscient? You don't know nearly as much as you think. I have no contempt, I was making the case that you spent more time/space in this thread discussing the form of your arguments than actually discussing the information that is pertinent to this debate.

I believe that my response did not force you to respond to it. Therefore, if you choose to read it, and choose to respond to it with a comment of your own, who is really responsible for the alleged waste of time? The choice was yours, and you chose to waste time.

It was my choice to read it, but I could not know what the content was until I read it. So I was sort of at an impass, I gave you the benefit of the doubt, and I was mistaken. I thought that perhaps you would have something pertinent to say but, alas, I was incorrect. You decided to blather on about something that was inconsequential.

Not at all. I didn't get you. You got yourself.

I have had little opportunity here at the FR to have discourse with any remotely as arrogant or offputting as you. Congrats.

I'm sorry if you have made this misinterpretation (no doubt without reading all the posts), but this ends up re-inforcing the point of the wise man about how a man feels about what he does not understand.

I and a majority of the other folks who followed this thread made the same "misinterpretation", but that wouldn't matter to you considering you have a command of all knowledge, according to yourself.

Why would you be around? I thought that the 'yap yap' was bothering you? And I knew it was not a threat, but it did seem like someone who thought too highly of himself and his presence.I would be around, because I have been around here for the last year. I will be more clear so that you will know exactly what I mean this time. I will see you around at some later time, in some later thread. I try to be positive around here, so even though I found your contributions less than desirable in this thread (and likely the same will occur on another thread of this content) I will say that I enjoyed the first part of your homepage. ISLAM is a TERRORIST ORGANIZATION. and I appreciate that you reference the truth about mohammed. So hopefully the next time I see you will be on an article about Islamism so we can be more cordial before we become combative again.

To be clear: I am done with this thread re: LtdGovt and I will be around, just not in this specific thread. got it? Good day.

249 posted on 03/04/2007 8:10:54 AM PST by thehumanlynx (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson