Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Surge’ Units to be Fully Trained, Equipped, Leaders Say
American Forces Press Service ^ | Sgt. Sara Wood, USA

Posted on 02/27/2007 4:50:42 PM PST by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Feb. 27, 2007 – The Army and Marine Corps units that will make up the 21,500-troop surge to Iraq will meet the same standards of training as every unit that deploys and have all the equipment they need to accomplish the mission, leaders from the two services said here today.


The Army is deploying five brigade combat teams and a division headquarters to Iraq, in addition to extending one National Guard BCT already in theater. None of the five BCTs will deploy with less than a year between deployments, and each will meet the Army’s pre-deployment training regimen, Army Maj. Gen. Richard Formica, director of force management, told reporters at a Pentagon media roundtable.

“The secretary of the Army and chief of staff of the Army remain committed to providing to the combatant commander the best-trained, best-equipped and best-led force in the world,” Formica said. “With the plus-up, that commitment will not change. Our deploying units will be manned, trained and equipped, and they will be ready for their specified missions.”

The Army has deployed more than 60 BCTs to Iraq over the past four years, Formica said. As lessons are learned in theater, they are applied to the pre-deployment training regimen to make it more effective. Commanders at every level have assessed the readiness of their units and, at this point, have determined that they are or will be ready for their assigned mission, he said. He added that commanders have the full support of the chain of command to ensure that any additional resources that are required will be provided.

“We’re committed to sending trained and ready units to the fight,” he said.

Army Brig. Gen. Charles Anderson, director of force modernization, challenged recent media reports stating that the units that will be part of the surge have severe equipment shortages. That is simply not true, he said, emphasizing that the Army does not compromise its force-protection standards for deploying units.

The units involved in the surge were already scheduled to deploy, so they have received most of their equipment needs, Anderson said. Army leaders have worked with the commanders in the theater and those ready to deploy to ensure equipment needs are met, he said. Army leaders have a weekly teleconference with commanders in the theater, and equipping liaisons go with deploying units.

Anderson said the units deploying as part of the surge will have the same force protection equipment all Army units deploy with, including unmanned aerial vehicles, unit tracking devices, satellite communications, vehicular radios, handheld radios, and active aerial sensors to improve situational awareness. They also have night-vision devices, long-range thermal sensors, thermal weapons sites, sniper rifles, and long-range munitions to avoid detection. Also, the units have route-clearance equipment, helicopters equipped with aircraft survivability equipment, counter-improvised explosive device equipment, tank and Bradley survivability kits, armored gun shields, and comprehensive vehicle and body armor.

“The Army’s No. 1 priority is the protection of the soldier,” Anderson said. “We achieve protection from a holistic perspective and, contrary to recent print, the plus-up of forces will have the equipment they need.”

The troop surge involves about 4,000 Marines, Marine Brig. Gen. Joseph Dunford, director of the service’s operations division, said. Two battalions in Anbar province have been extended for 45 to 60 days, and a Marine expeditionary unit has been extended for 60 days. To relieve those extended units, two units that were previously scheduled to deploy in the summer will now deploy in late spring, he said. All of these units have been fully trained to Marine Corps standards and will have the equipment they need to perform their missions, he said.

“There’s no difference between the units that are part of the plus-up and the units that are forward deployed right now,” he said.

Related Articles:
DoD Official: ‘Surge’ Won’t Leave Troops Ill-Equipped, Unprotected


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: equipped; frwn; fullytrained; surge; units

1 posted on 02/27/2007 4:50:48 PM PST by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...
FR WAR NEWS!

WAR News at Home and Abroad You'll Hear Nowhere Else!

All the News the MSM refuses to use!

Or if they do report it, without the anti-War Agenda Spin!

2 posted on 02/27/2007 4:51:37 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
“The Army’s No. 1 priority is the protection of the soldier,” Anderson said. “We achieve protection from a holistic perspective and, contrary to recent print, the plus-up of forces will have the equipment they need.”

Murtha be damned.

3 posted on 02/27/2007 4:53:53 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Just think how small the federal government would be if the same standards applied to them...


4 posted on 02/27/2007 4:54:23 PM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

I get so tired of hearing the MSM and the Dims talk about shortages, lack of training or equipment, or time off between deployments. When I deployed (twice) there were always parts shortages, or personell shortages, or 36 or 48 hour days. You just did it. Whatever it took. You got the job done. People talk about lack of body armor on one hand, and then blame the body armor for the large number of amputations. That they would have died in previous wars and have to suffer now because of the body armor. I'm sick of them. /rant


5 posted on 02/27/2007 4:59:32 PM PST by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson