Posted on 03/01/2007 8:29:00 PM PST by FreeKeys
BEIJING, Feb. 27 -- The Communist Party cautioned China's increasingly impatient reformers and intellectuals Tuesday that political liberalization and democracy are still a long way off despite the rapid pace of economic change over the past two decades.
The warning, in an article attributed to Premier Wen Jiabao in the official People's Daily newspaper, constituted the party's first known response to a bubbling up of political debate as China prepares for an annual session of its legislature and an important Communist Party congress that is scheduled for this fall.
Most of the debate has remained behind closed doors, in keeping with the party's tradition of secrecy. But two recent articles by prominent establishment figures brought into the open suggestions to President Hu Jintao's government that moving faster on political reforms would help smooth the transformation to a market economy.
One, by Zhou Ruijun, a former People's Daily editor known for reformist views, said greater democratic openness is necessary to defuse tensions over a growing gap between rich and poor, which he warned could lead to instability. Another, by former Renmin University vice president Xie Tao, suggested that China should move speedily toward a Scandinavian-like social-welfare democracy.
Wen, who recently was reported to be in charge of preparing a leadership platform for the party congress, reached into familiar Marxist vocabulary to build an argument that China is not yet ready for such a democracy, even though it remains a distant goal for the "socialism with Chinese characteristics" that the party hopes to build.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
This experiment will fail. The numnuts in the Commie Party will have to kill millions to keep the lid on...
Keep wishing and keep your fingers crossed, "free traders" and you New Democrat Third Way "progressives."
growing gap between rich and poor
Problems?
What about pandemic corruption?
Pollution that kills hundreds of thousands each year?
Industrial accidents that kills a hundred thousand or so each year?
Second-class citizenship and abuse of rural folks flocking to cities for jobs?
Hundreds of thousands forced out of their homes for projects like dams?
Tens of thousands forced out of their homes to build industrial parks and luxury homes -- corrupt Party officials pocket the payments, peasants get little or nothing?
The tension between Maoists and Dengists?
The remaining worthless government owned and operated enterprises which drain billions in resources but to close more of them would put tens of millions more out of work?
The huge number of nonperforming loans that Chi-com banks have that support the worthless government owned and operated enterprises?
The estimated 100 million+ "floating population" of unemployed?
Are they really serious about "reform"?
The Communist Party of the old Soviet Union officially acknowledged Stalin's crimes and removed his body from its place of honor in a mausoleum in Red Square. During the 20th party congress (1956, three years after Stalin's death) Premier Nikita Khrushchev testified about Stalin's crimes. De-Stalinization reached a climax at the 22d party congress in 1961 with the removal of Stalin's body.
There's been no condemnation of Mao.
There a reluctance among many tradition-minded party members to abandon the long-standing socialist principle that the state owns all land. . . [They fear] wholesale jettisoning of communist doctrine that has occurred in China since Deng's reforms began.
No problem. They've modified that principle to "the state owns all western intellectual property;" it ain't stealing so pound salt WTO and you useful idiots!
"Without sustained rapid growth of the productive forces, it is impossible to finally secure the fairness and social justice that lie at the heart of the socialist system."
A way of saying if we don't create tens of millions of jobs each year there will be civil war -- another Mao revolution? It sure looks a lot like Chiang's Nationalist Government -- except he didn't have the pollution and land seizures.
Wen acknowledged that China's market-oriented economic development must also include more social justice
That's the part that attracts the New Democrat Third Way "progressives." The "free traders'" market-oriented economic development builds the wealth in China then the commies and the New Democrat Third Way "progressives" take it -- I think it has to do with that dialectal materialism thingy.
Democlacy velly distant goal! First we need leunite Taiwan with Mothahland! Then leplace United States as Supahpowah! Then no one alound to nag us about democlacy anyway!
It is in their 1,000 years plan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.