On Ann Coulter - Idiotic. Disgusting. Stupid. Moronic. (conservatives respond)

All of my children are educated, have their medical and dental taken care of on my dime, not on the backs of others...

The circumstance of their mothers are none of your concern really. It is a perfectly natural thing for a man to father children and care for them.

But since you think it is weird, and that homosexual perverts are somehow fine and dandy, I question your sanity.

1,261 posted on 03/04/2007 5:12:55 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)

I weep for the future.

You should. You have promoted a lot of filth in the world that will haunt you some day.

1,262 posted on 03/04/2007 5:14:07 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)

I am tired of these people who try to pass some perversion of nature off as a normal thing. It is a fetish, a religion of deviance and I will not bend my knee in acquiescence to it.

1,263 posted on 03/04/2007 5:18:35 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)

1,264 posted on 03/04/2007 5:20:03 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)

Lord of the Rings - Return of the King...

Eowyn kills the Witch King of Angmar.

Ann Coulter skewers the homo king of Hollywood (David Geffen).

1,265 posted on 03/04/2007 5:22:38 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

I am with you on that one. And they will employ just about any disingenuous tactic to silence your voice, including trying to browbeat people with their version of the Bible or or inferring that their behavior is above board while yours is contemptible etc, and other such tactics in an attempt to slit off and isolate.

Well at the core of it, there is just not a nice way to deal with some of these people, for they would walk all over one if they could.

This needs repeated.

It is a fetish, a religion of deviance and I will not bend my knee in acquiescence to it.

1,266 posted on 03/04/2007 5:31:35 PM PST by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)

"No, she wasn't. Faggot is derogatory term for homosexuals. It's also a derogatory term for heterosexual men who behave effeminately. What do you think she meant concerning Edwards?" It is a derogatory term either way and an ad hominem attack. There are plenty of things about Edward's issues and his hypocritical behavior pertaining to those issues that she could have lampooned.

"No, what she was doing was make a very important and relevant point about a group of phonies who were doing real harm to real people and this country." There is nothing important or relevant about engaging in baseless speculation about the marriages of the Jersey girls. It was catty. But I suppose you think her comments about Playboy are relevant, too.

I recall them very well. They got a lot of attention, and not just for the Kerry campaigning but for their testimony before the 9/11 Commission. They got attention in the pundit circles, but average Americans had no clue who they were and they did nothing to help Kerry. It was Coulter who made them a household name -- and not in the way she had hoped. They got more sympathy and attention than they had before.

In fact, she was the subjects of death threats and at least one physical assault. You ever hear her whine about it? Yes, as a matter of fact, I did hear her complain about such things --- even a pie in the face. I don't know if "whine" is the word I would use, but she has every right to complain about such things. Pointing to their behavior is a good thing. That helped Bush immensely in the 2004 election. I think it was called "Faces of the Left" or something like that. The RNC put together an ad showing all the hatred from the left. Mind you, they didn't respond in kind -- he exposed them for what they were. It was particularly brilliant because it featured a "Hitler" ad from Moveon.org. Kerry raised a hissy fit, thinking the RNC had produced the Hilter ad and then he had egg on his face when it was pointed out that it came from his side.

That's a fair point of view, although I don't agree with it, and regardless Ann, unlike Michael Moore, has not been lying about anything. Certainly Michael Moore grossly outweighs Coulter both literally and on the lie scale, but I disagree with you claim that she's never lied. I consider baseless speculation about the personal lives of public figures to be lies or slander. And then there is the little matter of her providing false information for voter registration. Again, very minor compared to Moore's propaganda, but everyone lies.

"Ann Coulter's book had nada to do with the loss." Again, I disagree. If the book had slid under the radar, you might be right. But I think the coverage surrounding the Jersey Girl comments did, indeed, harm the image of conservatives and I think it helped validate the "Unremitting negative coverage of the Iraq War."

1,267 posted on 03/04/2007 5:36:24 PM PST by soccermom

Sorry, but the results of the last 3 elections disprove your points. You can expose them for what they are without being "nasty". When we did that in 2002 and 2004, we won. When Ann was "nasty" in 2006, we lost.

1,268 posted on 03/04/2007 5:38:43 PM PST by soccermom

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

All of my children are educated, have their medical and dental taken care of on my dime, not on the backs of others...

One suspects that at least some of them have the advantage of not having you around. That's something.

The circumstance of their mothers are none of your concern really. It is a perfectly natural thing for a man to father children and care for them.

You're the one who posted the information about impregnating three women and somehow equated that with masculinity. If I were asked, I would state that REAL MEN (your term), actually, you know, hang around their children and teach them what it means to be a man. But I readily admit your case may be the exception.

But since you think it is weird, and that homosexual perverts are somehow fine and dandy, I question your sanity.

Next time try reading for comprehension.

1,269 posted on 03/04/2007 6:23:43 PM PST by Gumlegs

When we did that in 2002 and 2004, we won.

In 2002, Ann got quite a bit of press for her criticism of Max Cleland.

In 2004, she wrote a bestseller in which she implied the entire Democratic Party was filled with traitors and in which she praised Joe McCarthy.

Ann is much more an asset than a liability. Her book had nothing to do with the loss. To think it did even in the slightest is to excuse a whole host of other things starting with the Republican Party.

1,270 posted on 03/04/2007 6:26:46 PM PST by Tribune7 (A bleeding heart does nothing but ruin the carpet)

One suspects that at least some of them have the advantage of not having you around.

Two of them are soldiers like their father was...

1,271 posted on 03/04/2007 6:31:33 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

Two of them are soldiers like their father was...

I was a commissioned officer in the U.S. Navy. It's not necessary for me to comment further.

1,272 posted on 03/04/2007 6:34:36 PM PST by Gumlegs

1,273 posted on 03/04/2007 6:38:45 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)

To: ajolympian2004

The response to her remarks shows just how far we have degenerated as a country.

1,274 posted on 03/04/2007 6:39:44 PM PST by BnBlFlag (Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis "Ya gotta saddle up your boys; Ya gotta draw a hard line")

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

I was a W5...

In the Army. You wouldn't have qualified as a mess cook in the Navy.

1,275 posted on 03/04/2007 6:49:23 PM PST by Gumlegs

To: Gumlegs; Sir Francis Dashwood

mess cook in the Navy

Sounds like something you evolved into. Did your ape prototype dream of it long ago?

1,276 posted on 03/04/2007 6:53:28 PM PST by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)

You wouldn't have qualified as a mess cook in the Navy.

And I wouldn't care to hear about it from a junior officer...

1,277 posted on 03/04/2007 6:57:55 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

And I wouldn't care to hear about it from a junior officer...

Your arrogance ranks right up there with your reading comprehension.

1,278 posted on 03/04/2007 7:03:17 PM PST by Gumlegs

Inversely speaking, of course.

1,279 posted on 03/04/2007 7:03:58 PM PST by Gumlegs

Sloppy, but at least you are getting into venues that evos really know something about, arrogance.

1,280 posted on 03/04/2007 7:05:52 PM PST by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794