[chiller]

Sounds to me like one or two jurors can't understand what "reasonable doubt" means and are holding out for conviction,

I'd bet - given the tendancies of a DC jury -- that 9 of the 11 want to convict, but 2 others know the case is NOT proven beyond reasonable doubt. The 9 wackos are trying to redefine terms to get the sane ones to budge.

[Lancey Howard]

Yep, I suppose I have to agree - - a Dirty City jury can't be any smarter than a Los Angeles "OJ" jury. That is, they couldn't spell "DNA" if you spotted them the 'D' and the 'A'. Stay out da Bushes. Convict. Etc.