"Wisenberg said the government is not required to prove guilt with 100% certainty."
Is this true or is this Clintoonesque, parsed lawyerspeak?
100% certainty != reasonable doubt
Not really. Theres a difference between shadow of a doubt and reasonable doubt.
That being said proving beyond a reasonable doubt is no low hurdle.
Yes :-)
In other words, it's both.
Yea, suppose they prove guilt at 72% ...Good enough?
"Is this true or is this Clintoonesque, parsed lawyerspeak?"
____
Solomon Wisenberg worked for Kenneth Starr.
He was not a part of the Clinton gang.