I do not and will not call it "normal". I do not support it, and am against it as a matter of course. Homsexual unions, homsexual advocacy, recognizing gays as an official sexual orientation and laws asssociated witht that, are all part and parcel of the same problem.
I do not say these things hatefully no more than I hate anyone else with what I consider to be severe emotiaonla or mental problems. If there behoavior becomes detreimental to society, then measures must bne taken to address that danger.
Today, our society, and many politicians in particular, do not want to admit the self evident and therefore rather than addressing a problem, they are being cajoled, bribed, and sweet talked into calling something bad, good or normal...or what's worse, as politicians, many are pandering to a problem simply to garner votes. It does a terrible disservice to society as a whole, and to those who are part of the life style and most adversely affected by it.
So, I do not hate the individuals, but I am firmly against the life style and see it as destructive to the very fabric of our society and therefore our peace, well being, and ultimately our liberty.
I am sure such statements will make people involved in that life style uncomfortable, particularly if their aim is to be accepted as and integrated into normal society in any case.
I did not say you were hateful.
All I call for is for conservatives not to deliberately alienate gays who might be persuaded at least to help defend our country.
Well stated.
Sometimes it is all in the way you say it.
You don't, however, run around calling them faggots, do you?
I agree completly. But what to do about it from a government perspective?
I can oppose abortion because it is murder. How do I oppose a homosexual lifestyle, other than from a religious prespective? (Which I do, by the way.)
If we walk down the path of a 'proper' lifestyle, we join the libs in banning smoking, transfats, using energy, etc.
Are the homosexuals simply in the "pursuit of happiness" as they define it?